19 April 2007 | Amendment to 2004 City law for 100% smokefree environments | Supplied statistical data: SHS & cessation rates | Supplied reports of tobacco problems in Mexico | Hospitality Sector complaints | | | | |
31 August 2007 | | | | New smokers' rights group is formed | First initiative for federal law | Supplied statistical data | Supplied reports of tobacco problems in Mexico | First initiative negotiated by the tobacco industry |
2 October 2007 | Amendment to allow DSAs | Ambiguity complaints | Ambiguity complaints | Hospitality sector complaints | | | | |
December 2007–February 2008 | Reintroduced 100% smokefree environments | Worked with NGOs on media campaigns | ‘Air Without Smoke is Life’ and ‘Breathe Respect’ | Arguments for the ‘right to smoke’ | House of congress approve federal law | Attempts to promote 100% smokefree places | Some denounce changes and some promote the law | BAT bulletin favours federal law complaints by tobacco growers |
26 February 2008 | Legislative assembly passes City law | Supported 100% City law | Supported 100% City law | Still argued for the ‘right to smoke’ | Senate passes federal law | Supported federal law | Some supported some opposed | Still argued for the ‘right to smoke’ |
4 April 2008 | City law comes into effect Regulations are published | Published regulations very quickly | Agreed quick approval of Regulations helped success | Confusion over which law applied in Mexico City | | | | |
April 2008–December 2008 | Implementing the City law | Worked with NGOs on media campaign | Media campaign ‘Thanks to you’ and ‘We all Breathe the Same Air’ | Hospitality sector complaints and legal challenge to City law | | Media campaign ‘We All Breathe the Same Air’ | Supported media campaign | |
August 2008–April 2009 | Compliance for the City law | Compliance reports (80%, 90% and 95%) | Supported compliance results | Hospitality sector applying federal law DSAs | Federal law comes into effect but no Regulations | INSP lobbied COFEMER | FIC and ACTA lobbied COFEMER | BAT, PMM, and CANIRAC lobbied COFEMER |
30 May 2009 | | | Complain about weak enforcing | | Federal law regulation published | | Agree with filtration systems | |
3 September 2009 | Supreme Court rules in favour of City law | Supported Supreme Court decision | Supported Supreme Court decision | | Supreme Court rules in favour of City law | Supported Supreme Court decision | Supported Supreme Court decision | |
6 January 2010 | | | | | Federal law amended ‘must’ back to ‘may’ | Supported decision | Supported decision | |