Table 5

Parent mediating variables

Variable	Time 2	Time 3	Time 4	Time 5
Seen community efforts to prevent youth access to tobacco^5-150		t(6) = −1.92^†	t(12) = −2.82^‡	t(14) = −4.98	ns^†
		p = 0.103	p = 0.016	p = 0.002	ns^†
Town support for tobacco access restrictions^5-150		t(6) = −4.27^†	t(12) = −2.93^‡	t(14) −3.28	ns^†
Town support for tobacco access restrictions^5-150		p = 0.005	p = 0.012	p = 0.006	ns^†
Town support for tobacco prevention		Random coefficients analysis:
		Linear effect:		t(14) = −3.48	p = 0.004
		Quadratic effect:		t(14) = 3.44	p = 0.004
How supportive have the following been to tobacco use prevention programs or activities:
Schools	ns	ns	ns	ns^†
Government officials	ns	ns	ns	ns^†
Business leaders		Random coefficients analysis:
		Linear effect:		t(14) = −2.56	p = 0.023
		Quadratic effect:		t(14) = 1.89	p = 0.080
Community support of alcohol and other drug prevention programmes	ns	ns	ns	ns^†
Joined a network of parents against tobacco use		t(14) = 1.85	ns		ns	ns^†
Joined a network of parents against tobacco use		p = 0.085^§	ns		ns	ns^†

↵5-150 These items were added to the parent questionnaire after T1.^†Only 8 communities at this T on this variable. ^‡Data from 14 communities at this T for this variable. ^§At time 2, this variable increased significantly for the CP condition (p = 0.018), but did not change for the SBO condition. ns, not significant.