Product type advertised* | |||
---|---|---|---|
e-Cigarettes (n=24 advertisements) | Cigars (n=4 advertisements) | Snus (n=7 advertisements) | |
% (N) | % (N) | % (N) | |
Themes† | |||
The product is less harmful than cigarettes | 37.5% (9) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
The product is an alternative to cigarettes when someone cannot smoke | 33.3% (8) | 25% (1) | 14.3% (1) |
The product is more ‘green’ or environmentally friendly than cigarettes | 54.2% (13) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
The product is less expensive than cigarettes | 0% (0) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
The product can help people to quit smoking | 20.8% (5) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
Flavour | |||
A flavoured product is being advertising in the advertisement | 8.3% (2) | 0% (0) | 100% (7) |
Price/Sweepstakes | |||
The advertisements feature a price promotion, discount coupon or price break | 8.3% (2) | 50% (2) | 85.7% (6) |
The advertisements mention or feature a sweepstakes | 0% (0) | 50% (2) | 0% (0) |
Landing page | |||
When advertisement is clicked, the advertisement links to a landing page | 58.3% (14) | 50% (2) | 58.3% (4) |
The landing page features information on how to quit smoking | 0% (0) | 0% (0) | 0% (0)n |
*Cigarettes were omitted since there was only one advertisement. e-Cigarette advertisements encompassed all advertisements from blu, NJOY, GreenSmoke, Vapor4Life and White Cloud. Cigar advertisements encompassed advertisements from Cao Cigars, Macanudo, Thompson and Zino. Snus advertisements encompassed only Swedish Snus advertisements.
†Coders were asked whether the advertisement suggested any of the following. Claims did not have to be overtly stated.