Table 3

Six logistic regressions for tobacco use comparing the contribution of peer group (continuous predictor) and race/ethnicity

CigarettesE-cigarettesHookahCigarsSmokelessAny use
Peer crowdOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Homebody0.97 (0.92 to 1.03)1.00 (0.94 to 1.07)0.96 (0.90 to 1.02)1.00 (0.92 to 1.08)1.01 (0.91 to 1.12)0.95 (0.90 to 1.00)
Country0.98 (0.93 to 1.04)0.98 (0.92 to 1.05)0.96 (0.90 to 1.03)1.08 (0.99 to 1.17)1.05 (0.95 to 1.16)0.96 (0.91 to 1.01)
Hip Hop1.06 (1.00 to 1.12)1.08 (1.01 to 1.15)1.04 (0.98 to 1.11)1.10 (1.01 to 1.20)1.09 (0.98 to 1.20)1.04 (0.98 to 1.09)
Hipster1.05 (0.99 to 1.10)1.03 (0.97 to 1.09)0.95 (0.89 to 1.01)0.99 (0.91 to 1.07)0.90 (0.82 to 0.99)1.02 (0.97 to 1.07)
Partier0.99 (0.94 to 1.05)1.03 (0.97 to 1.10)1.00 (0.94 to 1.07)1.06 (0.97 to 1.15)1.04 (0.94 to 1.15)0.98 (0.93 to 1.03)
Young Professional0.92 (0.87 to 0.97)0.98 (0.92 to 1.05)0.96 (0.90 to 1.02)0.97 (0.89 to 1.05)0.91 (0.82 to 1.00)0.92 (0.87 to 0.96)
Wald χ2,Wald χ2,Wald χ2,Wald χ2,Wald χ2,Wald χ2,
p 14.13, p<0.01p 3.97, p=0.41p 10.59, p<0.05p 10.45, p<0.05p 5.00, p=0.29p 14.99 p<0.01
Race/ethnicityOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
NH White
NH Black0.71 (0.48 to 1.04)1.27 (0.81 to 1.98)1.66 (1.09 to 2.52)1.80 (1.11 to 2.93)1.20 (0.62 to 2.31)0.91 (0.63 to 1.31)
NH Asian0.79 (0.62 to 1.01)1.18 (0.87 to 1.59)1.03 (0.77 to 1.39)1.10 (0.76 to 1.61)0.82 (0.50 to 1.35)0.81 (0.64 to 1.03)
NH Other1.21 (0.93 to 1.57)1.32 (0.97 to 1.80)1.46 (1.08 to 1.97)1.42 (0.96 to 2.08)0.98 (0.60 to 1.62)1.40 (1.08 to 1.81)
Hispanic0.82 (0.68 to 0.98)1.13 (0.91 to 1.41)1.08 (0.86 to 1.34)1.44 (1.09 to 1.90)1.31 (0.93 to 1.86)0.89 (0.75 to 1.06)
  • All models adjusted for age, sex, education, sexual orientation and location.

  • Bold indicates significant differences.