Table 3

Changes in prevalence of cigarette expenditure minimising strategies between 2010 (before the cigarette tax increase) and 2014 (after the cigarette tax increase) among past 30-day smokers by demographics, Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey

Cigarette expenditure minimising strategies2010 Weighted %2014 Weighted %Differences (%)AOR (95% CI)
Bought a cheaper brand of cigarettes
  White30.436.6+6.2 1.39 (1.05  to 1.82)
  Other41.138.0−3.10.94 (0.44 to  2.01)
  <High school26.854.3+27.5 5.00 (2.09 to  11.94)
  High school/GED41.538.5−3.00.92 (0.60 to  1.41)
  Some college28.833.3+4.51.20 (0.81 to  1.77)
  College and beyond12.423.8+11.3 2.53 (1.18 to  5.44)
Rolled own cigarettes
  Male22.030.4+8.5 1.62 (1.10 to  2.38)
  Female14.727.0+12.3 3.63 (2.24 to  5.89)
  White16.629.613.0 2.73 (1.97 to  3.79)
  Other28.925.7−3.30.72 (0.32 to  1.61)
Used coupons/promotions
  White63.252.2−11.0 0.64 (0.49 to  0.82)
  Other62.339.3−23.0 0.35 (0.16 to  0.75)
  • Bolded estimates are statistically significant (p<0.05). For each strategy, the model included year, age, gender, race/ethnicity, annual household income, education attainment, cigarettes per day and usually smoke menthol cigarettes.

  • AOR, adjusted OR.