Table 1

Differences in perceived informativeness and emotion between text and pictorial warning labels

Pictorial Labels (LSM, CI)Text Labels (LSM, CI)LSM Diff t-valuep-valueCohen’s d
Perceived Informativeness
 Overall (n=1838)6.14 (6.02 to 6.27)6.15 (6.02 to 6.27)0.250.800.003
 Never smoker (n=764)6.13 (5.96 to 6.31)6.16 (5.99 to 6.34)0.770.440.01
 Transitioning smoker (n=505)6.42 (6.17 to 6.68)6.39 (6.13 to 6.64)−0.770.440.01
 Current smoker (n=569)5.89 (5.67 to 6.11)5.90 (5.67 to 6.13)0.300.760.01
Emotion
 Overall4.42 (4.28 to 4.56)4.21 (4.07 to 4.35)−11.55<0.0010.08
 Never smoker3.63 (3.45 to 3.83)3.40 (3.21 to 3.59)−8.90<0.0010.10
 Transitioning smoker5.06 (4.74 to 5.37)4.82 (4.51 to 5.13)−6.04<0.0010.05
 Current smoker4.54 (4.27 to 4.80)4.38 (4.11 to 4.65)−4.91<0.0010.06
  • Estimates are from PROC MIXED models in SAS.

  • All estimates were adjusted for sex (men vs women), age (<25 years, 25–44 years, 45–64 years and 65+ years), race (white vs other races) and educational level (high school or less, some college and Bachelor’s degree or higher).

  • Smoking status was adjusted for in the overall estimates. In the estimates for current smokers, number of cigarettes smoked daily was also adjusted for. Cohen’s d was computed as differences in sample means divided by the corresponding pooled SD.

  • LSM, least squares means; LSM Diff, differences of least squares means.