Estimates were substantially higher than comparable independent estimates |
|
1 37 41 44–47 54–63 65–67 69–75 77–80
|
Criticism of collection methodology |
|
1 37 41 44–48 54–58 60–63 65 66 68–71 75–80
|
Criticism of analytical method |
|
1 44 46–48 54 55 57 59–61 65 66 68–71 74 75 78–80
|
Poor presentation of results |
Results are not presented adequately (eg, in a range or with CIs). Results are presented in a misleading manner. There are problems with study’s glossary/definitions. Methodological limitations are not discussed. Biased representation of existing literature.
|
1 37 44 46 48 54 55 57 58 60 66 67 70 71 73–76 78–80
|
Funding is a conflict of interest |
|
37 44 46 48 54 62 73–77 80
|
Author/s do not take responsibility for findings |
|
54 57 60 68 71 75 78 80
|
Not peer-reviewed |
|
37 54 75
|
Research contributes nothing of value |
|
55 74 80
|
Funding is not acknowledged |
|
54
|