Table 2

Perceived responsibility for cigarette butt litter

Group responsibleProportion attributing a great deal of responsibility for
Creating the problem, % (95% CI)Fixing the problem, % (95% CI)Fixing the problem
with cigarette butt facts, % (95% CI)*
Smokers
(n=396)
Non-smokers
(n=414)
Total†
(n=492)
Smokers
(n=396)
Non-smokers
(n=414)
Total†
(n=492)
Smokers
(n=396)
Non-smokers
(n=414)
Total†
(n=492)
Smokers71.0 (66.5 to 75.5)88.2(85.1 to 91.3)‡85.4 (82.3 to 88.5)71.7 (67.3 to 76.1)86.7(83.4 to 90.0)‡84.3 (81.1 to 87.5)75.8 (71.6 to 80.0)86.0(82.7 to 89.3)‡81.0 (77.5 to 84.5)
Cigarette companies40.4 (35.6 to 45.2)54.8(50.0 to 59.6)‡52.5 (48.1 to 56.9)40.9 (36.1 to 45.7)56.5 (51.7 to 61.3)‡54.0 (49.6 to 58.4)58.6(53.8 to 63.5)§76.3,(72.2 to 80.4)‡§73.5 (69.6 to 77.4)
Government22.0 (17.9 to 26.1)26.1 (21.9 to 30.3)25.4 (21.6 to 29.3)28.3 (23.9 to 32.7)35.3(30.7 to 39.9)§34.2 (30.0 to 38.4)35.9 (31.2 to 40.6)47.3(42.5 to 52.1)‡§41.7 (37.3 to 46.1)
City councils30.3 (25.8 to 34.8)18.1(14.4 to 21.8)¶20.0 (16.5 to 23.5)27.0 (22.6 to 31.4)26.1 (21.9 to 30.3)26.2 (22.3 to 30.1)33.8 (29.1 to 38.5)40.1(35.4 to 44.8)§37.0 (32.7 to 41.3)
  • *Response after respondents were presented with facts about the biodegradability and efficacy of filters.

  • †Sample weighted by smoking status.

  • ‡Non-smokers significantly higher attribution than smokers (p<.05).

  • §Significant increase in proportion holding group responsible following receipt of TPW information.

  • ¶Non-smokers significantly lower attribution than smokers (p<.05).

  • TPW, tobacco product waste.