Table 4

Logistic regression of association between noticing cigarettes displayed and susceptibility, and survey stage, controlling for smoking-related and demographic variables

Never-smokers noticing openly displayed at point of sale
1=notice (n=1693), 0=not (n=1225)
Never-smokers’ susceptibility to smoke
1=susceptible (n=673), 0=not (n=2239)
nAOR*95% CI
Lower
95% CI
Upper
P valuenAOR*95% CI
Lower
95% CI
Upper
P value
Survey stage<0.001<0.001
 Preban (2011)10012.131.732.63<0.0011 0011.311.061.620.014
 Mid-ban (2014)937Ref931Ref
 Postban (2016)9800.200.160.24<0.0019800.790.630.990.040
Any close friends smoke
 No2181Ref2176Ref
 Yes7371.391.131.720.0027362.211.812.71<0.001
Any siblings smoke0.532<0.001
 No/No siblings2425Ref2424Ref
 Yes3811.150.891.490.2743801.621.262.07<0.001
 Not sure/not stated1121.080.701.680.7211082.181.433.31<0.001
Parents smoke0.017<0.001
 Neither smokes1641Ref1641Ref
 Either9441.321.081.600.0059421.311.071.600.010
 Not sure/not stated3331.220.921.600.1673291.721.302.28<0.001
Gender
 Male1484Ref1483Ref
 Female14340.860.731.020.08414290.840.701.010.058
Age0.2070.002
 11
673Ref672Ref
 12 vs115431.110.861.440.4185411.060.791.420.704
 13 vs11125281.210.961.540.1115281.421.111.810.006
 14 vs11135061.090.871.38.0.4465041.140.901.450.284
 15 vs11143931.160.901.490.2393931.050.811.360.723
 16 vs11152750.820.621.100.1952740.610.440.840.003
Social grade
 Middle class (ABC1)1257Ref1255Ref
 Working class (C2DE)16611.000.841.180.95516570.960.801.160.684
Model χ²=656.03, df=14, p<0.001.
Hosmer and Lemeshow χ²=11.742, df=8, p=0.163.
Cases correctly classified: 73%.
35 cases excluded due to missing data on one or more independent variables.
Model χ²=170.52, df=14, p<0.001.
Hosmer and Lemeshow χ²=4.471, df=8, p=0.812.
Cases correctly classified: 77%.
41 cases excluded due to missing data on one or more independent variables.
  • *Adjusted for all other variables in the model.

  • AOR, adjusted OR; ref, reference category.