Table 2

Results of logistic regression models; demographic and psychosocial characteristics predicting ever and current JUUL use

Ever JUUL useCurrent JUUL use
OR (95% CI)
Age
 15–17 years 4.68**
(3.10 to 7.06)
16.19**
(8.89 to 29.50)
 18–21 years 4.48**
(3.12 to 6.42)
13.41**
(7.57 to 23.77)
 22–24 years 1.52*
(1.04 to 2.22)
3.59**
(2.00 to 6.58)
 25–34 yearsRefRef
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-HispanicRefRef
 Black/African-American, non-Hispanic 0.43**
(0.26 to 0.69)
0.45*
(0.25 to 0.83)
 Hispanic0.81
(0.59 to 1.11)
0.80
(0.54 to 1.20)
 Other, non-Hispanic0.82
(0.54 to 1.23)
0.76
(0.50 to 1.13)
Gender
 FemaleRefRef
 Male0.96
(0.77 to 1.21)
1.11
(0.84 to 1.46)
Perceived financial situation
 Live comfortablyRefRef
 Meet needs with a little left over0.78
(0.60 to 1.01)
0.54**
(0.40 to 0.73)
 Just meet basic expenses with nothing left over 0.55**
(0.40 to 0.76)
0.53**
(0.35 to 0.81)
 Don’t meet basic expenses0.48
(0.22 to 1.04)
0.38**
(0.20 to 0.73)
Sexual orientation
 HeterosexualRefRef
 Lesbian, gay, bisexual1.26
(0.93 to 1.72)
1.38
(0.90 to 2.12)
Region
 NortheastRefRef
 South0.74
(0.55 to 1.01)
0.69*
(0.49 to 0.97)
 Midwest 0.67*
(0.48 to 0.93)
0.69*
(0.47 to 0.998)
 West0.80
(0.57 to 1.11)
0.81
(0.54 to 1.21)
Household combustible and ENDS use
 No one I live with smokesRefRef
 Only ENDS 2.86**
(1.98 to 4.13)
4.10**
(2.56 to 6.57)
 Only combustible tobacco0.95
(0.67 to 1.34)
0.83
(0.53 to 1.30)
 Both ENDS and combustible tobacco 2.07**
(1.41 to 3.02)
2.87**
(1.78 to 4.60)
ENDS harm perceptions
 Less harmfulRefRef
 About the same harm 0.43**
(0.32 to 0.57)
0.34**
(0.24 to 0.49)
 More harmful 0.53**
(0.35 to 0.80)
0.39**
(0.23 to 0.65)
 Don’t know/refused 0.58**
(0.38 to 0.87)
0.35**
(0.22 to 0.56)
 Sensation seeking 1.76**
(1.52 to 2.05)
2.16**
(1.81 to 2.58)
Current combustible use
 NoRefRef
 Yes 2.93**
(2.27 to 3.78)
4.91**
(3.64 to 6.62)
  • *P<0.05; **P<0.01.

  • ENDS, electronic nicotine delivery system; Ref, reference.