Countries | Type of excise tax at the time of study | Excise tax proportion of price (%) at the time of study | Taxation system at the time of study | Greater reliance on specific tax (in mixed excise regime) | Studies | Year of publication | GDP per capita, PPP at the time of study (current international $) | TI pricing strategies | |||||||
Differentially shifting taxes | Introducing new brands/segments/products as downtrade pathways | Changing product attributes or production processes | Price discrimination and price related promotions | Price smoothing | Shrinkflation | ||||||||||
Overshifting | Undershifting | Overall pattern | |||||||||||||
High-income countries | |||||||||||||||
UK | Mixed excise | 61.8 | Uniform | Yes | Understanding TI pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market.41 | 2013 | 39 970.9 | Taxes are overshifted in all brand segments although at a lower rate for the ultra-low price segment | In March/April each year, the industry undershifts tax increase on ultra-low price brands. | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Mixed excise | 62.72 | Uniform | Yes | TI strategies undermine government tax policy: evidence from commercial data.42 | 2018 | 46 867.9 | Overshifting in higher segments | Undershifting in lower segments | Overshifting | Creation of new FM and RYO segments and launch of cheap products | Brands were repriced from high to low segment | TI introduced new ultra-low price category and kept its price constant via price discrimination | TI uses price smoothing | Amount sold per pack was reduced | |
Mixed excise | 62.72 | Uniform | Yes | UK tobacco price increases: driven by industry or public health?43 | 2019 | 48 709.7 | Overshifting taxes for both FM and RYO cigarettes | Undershifting on cheaper product | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Mixed excise | 62.72* | Uniform | Yes | Quantile regression of tobacco tax pass-through in the UK 2013–2019. How have manufacturers passed through tax changes for different tobacco products?44 | 2020 | 48 709.7† | Overshifting across the price distribution for both FM and RYO | – | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Mixed excise | 62.72* | Uniform | Yes | Impact of tobacco tax increases and industry pricing on smoking behaviours and inequalities: a mixed-methods study.45 | 2020 | 48 709.7† | Real prices of premium FM and RYO packs increased | Undershifting on subvalue packs and RYO tobacco packs | Overshifting | Creation of new FM and RYO segments and launch of cheap products including cigarillo | Brands were repriced from high to low segment | TI introduced new ultra-low price category and kept its price constant via price discrimination | TI uses price smoothing | Smaller packs (17–19 sticks) were introduced | |
Ireland | Mixed excise | 61 | Uniform | Yes | The Irish TI position on price increases on tobacco products.46 | 2011 | 44 855.3 | TI persistently raised tobacco prices by overshifting tax increase | Absent | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
USA | Specific excise† | N/A | Uniform | – | Do cigarette producers price-discriminate by state? An empirical analysis of local cigarette pricing and taxation.32 | 1996 | 29 967.7 | State taxes are overshifted | Absent | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | Cigarette producers do price-discriminate by state | N/E | N/E |
Specific excise† | 31.55‡ | Uniform | – | The incidence of tobacco taxation: evidence from geographic micro-level data.33 | 2008 | 48 382.5 | Tobacco tax was overshifted to consumers | Absent | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.73‡ | Uniform | – | The heterogeneous geographic and socioeconomic incidence of cigarette taxes: evidence from Nielsen Home scan Data.52 | 2012 | 51 610.6 | Absent | Taxes are less than fully passed through to consumer prices | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.73‡ | Uniform | – | The effect of cigarette taxation on prices: an empirical analysis using local-level data.34 | 2012 | 51 610.6 | Cigarette excise taxes are overshifted at both the state and local levels of government | N/E | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.73‡ | Uniform | – | Who pays cigarette taxes? The impact of consumer price search.35 | 2013 | 53 117.6 | Taxes are overshifted to smokers of light cigarettes | Taxes undershifted to heavy smokers, those who buy cartons and consumers who live near the border of a lower tax state | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | Discounts on buying cartons | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.38‡ | Uniform | – | Does every US smoker bear the same cigarette tax?36 | 2014 | 55 047.7 | Overshifting for smokers of premium brands who purchased by pack outside Indian reservations | Excise tax was undershifted to some smoker’s price-minimising strategies | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | Price reductions on purchase of cartons, buying on Indian reservations or buying generic brands | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.38‡ | Uniform | – | Continued implications of taxing RYO tobacco as pipe tobacco in the USA.50 | 2014 | 55 047.7 | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | Tobacco manufacturers repackaged roll-your-own tobacco as pipe tobacco | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.81‡ | Uniform | – | Tobacco product prices before and after a state-wide tobacco tax increase.89 | 2016 | 57 927.5 | Overshifting of the tobacco tax to consumers | Absent | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.81‡ | Uniform | – | Exploring impacts of taxes and hospitality bans on cigarette prices and smoking prevalence using a large dataset of cigarette prices at stores 2001–2011, USA.37 | 2017 | 59 957.7 | N/E | Cigarette excise taxes were undershifted and pass-through rates were slightly higher in areas with hospitality bans | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.76‡ | Uniform | – | Mind the gap: changes in cigarette prices after California’s tax increase.38 | 2019 | 65 280.6 | Overshifting of tax across all brands, greater at higher price points (more for ultra-premium than premium and for premium than value brand) | Undershifting was evident in neighbourhoods with more African-American and Hispanic residents | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | After tax increase, prices were significantly discounted, and more stores advertised a discount on cigarettes | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise† | 37.76‡ | Uniform | – | TI promotions and pricing after tax increases: an analysis of internal industry documents.39 | 2019 | 65 280.6 | Tobacco companies overshifted tax after the US federal tax doubled in 1983 | Lowered manufacturer price to undershift smaller tax increases | Both | N/E | N/E | Increased promotions at tax differential stores/border stores after tax increases in neighbouring states | N/E | N/E | |
Europe (23 countries) | Mixed excise | 57% excise tax rate on the most popular price category | – | Yes | An analysis of TI pricing strategies in 23 European Union countries using commercial pricing data.53 | 2019 | – | N/E | Undershifting in cheap segments of cigarette market. TI maintains or increases price gap. | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Spain | Mixed excise | 64.1 | Uniform | No | The Spanish tobacco tax loopholes and their consequences.51 | 2012 | 31 720.1 | N/E | N/E | N/E | TI marketed cheaper alternative tobacco products | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Czech Republic | Mixed excise | 60.9 | Uniform | Yes | TI manipulation of tobacco excise and tobacco advertising policies in the Czech Republic: an analysis of TI documents.12 | 2012 | 29 047.2 | The TI is overshifting tax increases | Absent | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
New Zealand | Specific excise | 64.16* | Uniform | – | The impact of an increase in excise tax on the retail price of tobacco in New Zealand.47 | 2015 | 37 475.1 | Overshifting tax on premium, mainstream and RYO brands | Undershifting excise tax on the budget brand | Both | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Taiwan | Mixed excise | 48 | Tiered | No | Exploiting a low tax system: non-tax-induced cigarette price increases in Taiwan 2011–2016.54 | 2019 | 50 592.5 | As a result of low and unchanged tobacco taxes tobacco companies overshifted to increase the real price of cigarettes | Absent | Overshifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Total HICs (22 studies) | 17 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
Upper middle income countries | |||||||||||||||
South Africa | Specific excise | 32.44 | Uniform | – | Industry responses to the tobacco excise tax increases in South Africa.66 | 2006 | 10 518.4 | Between 1990 and 2005, the industry increased its real retail rate by more than the increase in the real excise tax to increase its revenue | Absent | TI overshifted between 1990 and 2005 | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Specific excise | 40.12 | Uniform | – | The effect of excise tax increases on cigarette prices in South Africa.55 | 2017 | 12 703.4 | Between 1994 and 2010, the TI increased retail price of cigarettes twice a year: in March in response to the excise tax increase, and in July/ August largely independent of the price. | Since 2010, the excise tax was substantially undershifted | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Mexico | Mixed excise | 52 | Uniform | No | Self-reported price of cigarettes, consumption and compensatory behaviours in a cohort of Mexican smokers before and after a cigarette tax increase.56 | 2010 | 15 260.6 | N/E | Tobacco taxes undershifted on cheaper national brands | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Mixed excise | 52.8 | Uniform | No | Tax, price and cigarette brand preferences: a longitudinal study of adult smokers from the ITC Mexico Survey.57 | 2013 | 17 373.8 | N/E | Tobacco taxes undershifted on national/discount brands | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
China | Mixed excise | 26.2 | Tiered | No | Can increases in the cigarette tax rate be linked to cigarette retail prices? Solving mysteries related to the cigarette pricing mechanism in China.65) | 2012 | 11 197.5 | Absent | Excise tax increase in China does not result in increase in retail price of cigarettes | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Thailand | Mixed excise | N/A | Tiered | Yes | Thailand: winning battles, but the war’s far from over.61 | 2000 | 7302.8 | Absent | TTCs have been absorbing tax increases | Undershifting | Introduced cheaper brands | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Turkey | Mixed excise | 66.11 | Uniform | No | Antitobacco control industry strategies in Turkey.60 | 2018 | 28 139.1 | N/E | In 2011, TTCs undershifted taxes to reduce the amount consumers had to pay | Undershifting | Manufactured slim, super-slim cigarettes and flavoured cigarettes and TI manufactured more varieties of products | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Mauritius | Specific excise | 70.50 | Uniform | – | TI tactics in response to cigarette excise tax increases in Mauritius.64 | 2019 | 23 942.1 | TI overshifted the tax increase on premium and popular brand cigarettes | Substantially undershifted tax increase for economy cigarettes | Both | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Lower middle income countries | |||||||||||||||
Ukraine | Mixed excise | 54 | Uniform | Yes | Economic and public health impact of 2007–2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine.49 | 2011 | 8218.8 | Larger tax increases led to overshifting of taxes | Smaller tax increases were undershifted | Both | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Indonesia | Specific excise | 44* | Tiered | – | The tobacco excise system in Indonesia: hindering effective tobacco control for health.69 | 2009 | 8021.7 | Absent | Excise tax is being absorbed by firms rather than being passed on to consumers | Undershifting | N/E | Firms reduced their production levels to fall within lower tax brackets | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Specific excise | 49.45 | Tiered | – | Firms’ performance under a different cigarette tax system: empirical evidence from Indonesian cigarette manufacturing firms.58 | 2018 | 11 646.4 | N/E | There is presence of tax undershifting | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Specific excise | 49.45 | Tiered | – | Cigarette prices in a complex cigarette tax system: empirical evidence from Indonesia.59 | 2019 | 12 301.7 | Absent | Tax is partially passed on to consumers | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |
Pakistan | Specific excise | 45.79 | Tiered | – | Smoke screen: estimating the tax pass-through to cigarette prices in Pakistan.63 | 2016 | 4410.4 | N/E | Taxes are undershifted, more for budget and midrange brands as compared with premium brands | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
Bangladesh | Ad valorem excise | 56 | Tiered | – | A decade of cigarette taxation in Bangladesh: lessons learnt for tobacco control.62 | 2019 | 4950.7 | Increased prices at the high end of the market | Lower rate of excise tax for the low-price tier incentivised the expansion of the market for low-price cigarettes | Undershifting | Downward brand substitution (from high to low price cigarettes). Upward product substitution (from bidis to low-priced cigarettes), | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E |
TI pricing undermines tobacco tax policy: a tale from Bangladesh.20 | 2020* | 4950.7 | Overshifting for brands at high end of the tiered system | Undershifting for brands in the low tiers | Undershifting | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | N/E | |||||
Total LMICs (15 studies) | 6 | 14 | --- | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Total (37 studies) | 23 | 26 | --- | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
*Excise tax proportion of price (%) quoted for the previous year due to data availability.
†Data for GDP per capita, PPP at the time of study (current international $) are presented for 2019 as 2020 data were unavailable.
‡Cigarettes in the USA are taxed at both the federal and state levels, so taxes will vary within country.
FM, factory made; HICs, high-income countries; RYO, roll-your-own; TI, tobacco industry.