Table 1

SHS concentrations before and after implementation of the tobacco control law

20132018P value*
Characteristics of monitored venues
No of venues2427
Location†0.947
 Hanoi (n (%))14 (58.3)16 (59.3)
 Ho Chi Minh City (n (%))10 (41.7)11 (40.7)
Type of venue0.999
 Restaurant (n (%))9 (37.5)10 (37.1)
 Coffee shop (n (%))8 (33.3)9 (33.3)
 Cafeteria (n (%))7 (29.2)8 (29.6)
Smoking policy0.451
 Smoking venues (n (%))6 (25)4 (14.8)
 Partial venues (n (%))11 (45.8)17 (63)
 Smoke-free venues (n (%))7 (29.2)6 (22.2)
Observation information‡
 Volume, m3 (mean±SD)183.7 (137.4)331.1 (381.1)0.036
 Ventilation system (n, % yes)21 (87.5)20 (74.1)0.228
 No of people (mean±SD)21.2 (8.5)19.4 (6.5)0.657
 No of smokers (mean±SD)6.8 (1.5)4.6 (3.3)0.008
 No of cigarettes smoked (mean±SD)13.8 (4.5)8.9 (5.7)0.012
 Active total smoker density, smokers/m3 (mean±SD)12.0 (4.6)5.6 (6.4)0.001
 Other burning sources (candles, fireplace etc) (n, % yes)NoNo
 Kitchen area open to the monitoring area8 (33.3)6 (22.2)0.375
PM2.5 concentration‡
 Geometric mean (95% CI)93.1 (88.9–97.4)55.6 (53.1–58.2)0.05
 Mean (SD)138.7 (152.3)82.3 (92.8)
 Median (min max)72 (20–996.2)55.3 (5.8–913) 0.01
No. of venues with PM2.5 higher than the standard (n, %)
 Vietnam, ambient air regulation§17 (70.8)18 (66.7)0.75
 WHO standard¶20 (83.3)24 (88.9)0.56
  • *Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for quantitative outcomes and Kendall’s tau-b for categorical outcomes.

  • †Campaign 1 included only venues from Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City to be consistent with campaign 2.

  • ‡Analysis was based on a 30 min period during the busiest time for each venue in both campaigns.

  • §Ministry of natural resources and environment,43 24 hours standard of 50 µg/m3.

  • ¶WHO 24 hours standard of 25 µg/m3.

  • SHS, secondhand smoke.