Comparison of notifications across India’s state and union territories and WHO guidelines for implementation of Article 5.3
State | Punjab | Mizoram | West Bengal | Himachal Pradesh | Mahar ashtra | Bihar | Jammu and Kashmir | Tamil Nadu | Jharkhand | Karnataka | Kerala | Uttar Pradesh | Megh alaya | |
District | Darjeeling | Howrah | ||||||||||||
Year | 2015 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | 2019 | 2019 |
Article 5.3 recommendations | ||||||||||||||
Raise awareness about the addictive and harmful nature of tobacco products and about tobacco industry interference with parties’ tobacco control policies | ||||||||||||||
Establish measures to limit interactions with the tobacco industry and ensure the transparency of those interactions that occur | ||||||||||||||
Reject partnerships and non-binding or non-enforceable agreements with the tobacco industry | ||||||||||||||
Avoid conflicts of interest for government officials and employees | ||||||||||||||
Require that information provided by the tobacco industry be transparent and accurate | ||||||||||||||
Denormalise and, to the extent possible, regulate activities described as ‘socially responsible’ by the tobacco industry, including but not limited to activities described as ‘corporate social responsibility’ | ||||||||||||||
Do not give preferential treatment to the tobacco industry | ||||||||||||||
Treat state-owned tobacco industry in the same way as any other tobacco industry | ||||||||||||||
Mechanisms for implementation | ||||||||||||||
Code of conduct | ||||||||||||||
Empowered committee |
Broad consistency;
Limited provision;
Omitted completely.