Table 2

Multilevel propensity score model (PSM) to predict a retail violation of sales to minors (RVSM) in 2017 (129 911 inspections clustered in n=26 131 zip codes)*

Predictive variablesOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)Adjusted p value
Zip code-level inspections and retailers
Number of inspections 2015–2016†1.00 (1.00 to 1.00)0.66580.988 (0.987 to 0.99)<0.0001
Number of violations 2015–2016†1.02 (1.02 to 1.03)<0.00011.07 (1.06 to 1.08)<0.0001
Number of penalties 2015–2016†1.06 (1.05 to 1.08)<0.00010.97 (0.95 to 0.99)0.0011
Number of tobacco retailers‡1.21 (1.09 to 1.35)0.0007Not included
Zip code-level characteristics
Population§1.00 (1.00 to 1.00)0.00451.00 (1.00 to 1.01)0.0011
Metropolitan (vs non-metropolitan)1.22 (1.17 to 1.28)<0.00011.3 (1.22 to 1.38)<0.0001
Race/ethnicity¶
 Caucasian (%)0.95 (0.94 to 0.96)<0.0001Not included**
 African American (%)1.08 (1.07 to 1.09)<0.00011.04 (1.03 to 1.06)<0.0001
 Hispanic (%)1.01 (1.00 to 1.03)0.15770.99 (0.98 to 1.01)0.5383
 Asian (%)0.90 (0.86 to 0.94)<0.00010.94 (0.89 to 0.98)0.0101
 American Indian (%)1.19 (1.10 to 1.28)<0.00011.19 (1.10 to 1.29)<0.0001
Age distribution (years)¶
 10–17 (%)0.85 (0.79 to 0.93)0.00020.80 (0.73 to 0.88)<0.0001
 18–20 (%)1.10 (1.03 to 1.18)0.00621.04 (0.95 to 1.15)0.3729
 21–24 (%)1.15 (1.07 to 1.24)0.00010.99 (0.89 to 1.10)0.8253
Education and income¶
 Bachelor’s degree or higher (%)0.96 (0.94 to 0.98)<0.00010.97 (0.95 to 1.00)0.0188
 Poverty (%)1.14 (1.11 to 1.17)<0.00011.02 (0.98 to 1.07)0.2504
County-level characteristics
 Adult smoking prevalence (%)¶1.28 (1.20 to 1.36)<0.00011.13 (1.03 to 1.23)0.0068
Zip code-level Tobacco 21 policies††
NoReferenceReference
Local0.72 (0.64 to 0.81)<0.00010.70 (0.63 to 0.79)<0.0001
State0.49 (0.40 to 0.61)<0.00010.50 (0.4 to 0.62)<0.0001
State-level characteristics
Cigarette tax ($)†††0.97 (0.95 to 0.99)0.0011Not included**
Tobacco retail licensing††
 E-cigarettes or other tobacco products0.58 (0.54 to 0.62)<0.00010.66 (0.62 to 0.71)<0.0001
 Tobacco products other than e-cigarettes0.81 (0.77 to 0.85)<0.00010.83 (0.78 to 0.87)<0.0001
 No license requiredReferenceReference
  • *PSM development: multilevel propensity score was developed using generalised estimating equation model, where the dependent variable was RVSM (yes vs no) at each inspection in 2017 and the explanatory variables included all variables listed in the first column as fixed effects along with the random effects shown in equation (1).ORs from univariate analysis and aORs from the multivariable analysis are reported.

  • †Per 1 unit increase.

  • ‡Per 100 units increase.

  • §Per 1000 people increase.

  • ¶Per 10% increase.

  • **Due to multicollinearity with other predictors, Caucasian (%) and state cigarette tax were not included in the multivariable regression.

  • ††As of December 2016.

  • aOR, adjusted OR.