Table 2

Association between tobacco outlet density and SHS exposure (airborne nicotine and serum cotinine), adjusting for confounders and clustering

CharacteristicAir nicotine (n=108)Serum cotinine (n=36)
β (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P value
Tobacco outlet density0.05 (0.02 to 0.08)<0.010.03 (−0.01 to 0.06)0.01
Age−0.06 (−0.23 to 0.12)0.53−0.11 (−0.03 to 0.25)0.11
Caregiver college education−0.22 (−1.11 to 0.66)0.62−0.43 (−1.28 to 0.42)0.32
Public insurance−0.12 (−1.78 to 1.53)0.88−4.71 (−6.31 to 3.10)<0.01
Caregiver income
 <$20 000
 $20 000–$39 999−0.24 (−1.17 to 0.69)0.620.01 (−0.80 to 0.83)0.98
 $40 000−1.40 (−3.22 to 0.42)0.13−5.33 (−6.74 to 3.92)<0.01
Smokers present2.07 (1.16 to 2.99)<0.011.77 (0.69 to 2.85)<0.01
Household occupancy0.17 (−0.03 to 0.36)0.10−0.06 (−0.49 to 0.36)0.77
Row home/town home/apartment0.26 (−0.69 to 1.21)0.59−0.38 (−1.79 to 1.04)0.60
  • Adjusted tobit regression model used.

  • SHS, secondhand smoke.