Table 1

Distribution of supporting and opposing arguments, actors and tobacco control measures in relation to the PP 109/2012 amendment in news articles, 2016–2023

TotalSupportiveOpposed
N%N%N%
Argument typen=2681n=1448n=1413
Smoking trend and initiation33111.630621.1251.8
E-cigarette use in the population501.7503.500.0
Health and safety implications29410.324016.6543.8
Protect the population1364.81339.230.2
TAPS/smoking exposure1023.61017.010.1
Accessibility and affordability of tobacco products381.3372.610.1
Tobacco industry interference170.690.680.6
Science-based1746.11399.6352.5
COVID-19 pandemic recovery642.2100.7543.8
Country exemplary782.7604.1181.3
Economic impacts983.4483.3503.5
Impact on the industry2328.100.023216.4
Tobacco farmers/workers welfare2538.8181.223516.6
Regulatory drafting process1113.930.21087.6
Vested/foreign interest1013.540.3976.9
Amended regulation will not be effective461.600.0463.3
Illicit trade301.000.0302.1
Industry’s economic/social contribution1384.840.31349.5
Other national/subnational agenda1204.21037.1171.2
The current regulation is not sufficient1304.51309.000.0
The current regulation is sufficient1555.400.015511.0
Other1635.9533.61107.7
Actorsn=2119n=858n=1261
 Civil society organisations (CSO)65230.834940.730324.0
 Scholars/experts1778.4576.61209.5
 Health professionals1778.417620.510.1
 Government45221.324128.121116.7
 Farmers331.620.2312.5
 Retailers90.400.090.7
 E-cigarette consumers723.400.0725.7
 Tobacco industry25311.900.025320.1
 Industry front groups22710.700.022718.0
 Other673.2333.8342.7
Tobacco control measuresn=293n=234n=59
 Tax/price113.8104.311.7
 Smoking cessation service31.031.300.0
 Tobacco advertisement, promotion, sponsorship (TAPS)7023.95523.51525.4
 Health warning label (HWL)7324.95322.62033.9
 E-cigarette/HTP regulation8529.07933.8610.2
 Institutional capacity20.720.900.0
 Cigarette sale289.6166.81220.3
 Cigarette additives62.031.335.1
 Smoke-free area82.773.011.7
 Other72.462.611.7