Regular ArticleEvaluation of a Minimal Self-Help Smoking Cessation Intervention Following Cervical Cancer Screening☆
References (23)
- et al.
Smoking and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: nicotine and cotinine in serum and cervical mucus in smokers and nonsmokers
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1988) - et al.
Sensitivity and specificity of saliva thiocyanate and cotinine for cigarette smoking: a comparison of two collection methods
Addict Be hav
(1991) - et al.
Promoting smoking cessation among women who seek cervical can cer screening
Obstet Gynecol
(1998) - et al.
Trends and effects of cigarette smoking among girls and women in the United States, 1965–1993
J Am Med Womens Assoc
(1996) Commentary: Smoking v women's health: the challenge ahead
J Am Med Womens Assoc
(1996)MMWR
(1996)Women's use of health care
- et al.
Postpartum relapse to smoking: a prospective study
Health Educ Res
(1992) - et al.
Biochemical epidemiology of cervical neopla sia: measuring cigarette smoke constituents in the cervix
Cancer Res
(1987) - et al.
Nicotine and cotinine in the cervical mucus of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
(1992)
Evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation interventions with a self-help smoking ces sation program
J Consult Clin Psychol
Cited by (50)
A Randomized Controlled Study of Integrated Smoking Cessation in a Lung Cancer Screening Program
2019, Journal of Thoracic OncologyCitation Excerpt :Finally, a pilot study recently reported on short-term (3-month) quit rates in 92 screening participants randomized to a telephone counseling intervention similar to ours versus usual care and noted similar self-reported quit rates (21.7% vs. 19.6%), although biochemically confirmed quit rates were higher (17.4% vs. 4.3%).36 Attempts at integrating smoking cessation with cervical cancer screening has had mixed success.16,37,38 The difficulty in showing increased smoking cessation rates in screening programs through the application of interventions otherwise considered effective requires further discussion.39
Smoking Cessation among Female and Male Veterans before and after a Randomized Trial of Proactive Outreach
2019, Women's Health IssuesAcceptability of receiving lifestyle advice at cervical, breast and bowel cancer screening
2019, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Most participants indicated they would like to receive lifestyle advice at the screening appointment itself. Other research suggests the timing of interventions delivered in the context of cancer screening is important (McBride et al., 1999). It has also been reported that people attending screening would prefer advice to be given by an expert, such as a health professional (Fisher et al., 2007).
The Equity Impact of Proactive Outreach to Smokers: Analysis of a Randomized Trial
2018, American Journal of Preventive MedicinePreliminary evaluation of a telephone-based smoking cessation intervention in the lung cancer screening setting: A randomized clinical trial
2017, Lung CancerCitation Excerpt :Building on our prior work [9,14–16], we evaluated a scalable telephone counseling (TC) cessation intervention to provide a personalized, intensive intervention in which the LCS result is leveraged to enhance motivation. TC has demonstrated effectiveness among older smokers [5,17–21], smokers who are not ready to quit [22–32], and non-treatment seeking smokers [29,33], making it an important intervention to test in this setting. In a randomized clinical trial, we hypothesized that TC would yield higher quit rates than usual care.
Perspectives in Implementing a Primary Care-Based Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Misuse
2015, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :The model highlights the importance of clinical information systems (e.g., electronic health records and patient registries); decision support (e.g., evidence-based practice guidelines); delivery system design (e.g., specified roles for all practice personnel); and self-management support (e.g., behavioral counseling interventions) that may be supported by community resources. At the time this study was being designed and implemented, the research team had been involved in several primary care–based behavioral counseling studies.14–20 Although the behavioral targets and study protocols varied, all of the studies benefited from the Chronic Care Model as a guiding framework as well as from a foundational commitment to “get practice into research.”
- ☆
This work was supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grants CA60141, CA72099, and CA76945 and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Grant HL48121-05.
- 2
To whom reprint requests should be addressed at Duke Compre hensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention, Detection and Control Research Program, Hanes House—Box 2949, Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710-2949.