Abstract
Objectives
We examine the determinants governing both countries’ enactment of smoking bans in public places and their ability to successfully put these bans into effect.
Methods
Using a large sample (N = 99–184) of low-, middle- and high-income countries, econometric techniques are used to estimate the influence of several variables on cross-national variations in the adoption and compliance of second-hand smoke laws (2010).
Results
We find similarities in the determinants of adoption and compliance. Yet more notable are the differences, with several political economy factors which have a statistically significant influence on countries’ level of compliance with existing smoke-free laws in public places found not to consistently influence their propensity to adopt bans in the first place. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are that governments are motivated to adopt smoking bans for reasons other than protecting the health of their citizens and that the real costs of smoking bans are predominantly borne at the compliance stage.
Conclusions
More effort needs to be made to ensure that governments realize their existing policy commitments through effective enforcement of bans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christopoulou R, Lillard DR, de la Miyar JRB (2013) Smoking behavior of Mexicans: patterns by birth-cohort, gender, and education. Int J Public Health 58(2):285–293
Clark B (2013) Multilateral, regional, and national determinants of policy adoption: the case of HIV/AIDS legislative action. Int J Public Health 58(2):285–293
Cohen JE, de Guia NA, Ashley MJ, Ferrence R, Northrup DA, Studlar DT (2002) Predictors of Canadian legislators’ support for tobacco control policies. Soc Sci Med 55(6):1069–1076
Drope JM (2010) The politics of smoke-free policies in developing countries: lessons from Africa. CVD Prev Control 5(3):65–73
FAO (2013) FAOSTAT CD ROM. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Feldman EA, Bayer R (2011) The triumph and tragedy of tobacco control: a tale of nine nations. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 7:79–100
Gallet CA (2009) Snuff the puff: international evidence on the determinants of anti-smoking laws. Appl Econ Lett 16(14):1449–1453
Gallet CA, Catlin JR (2009) The determinants of tobacco control in Europe: a research note. Soc Sci J 46(1):143–149
Gonzalez M, Glantz SA (2013) Failure of policy regarding smoke-free bars in the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 23(1):139–145
Hathaway OA (2002) Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law J 111(8):1935–2042
Hersch J, Rossi AFD, Viscusi WK (2004) Voter preferences and state regulation of smoking. Econ Inq 42(3):455–468
Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 5430
Laumbach R, Kipen H (2014) Mechanistic data support protecting non-smokers from the lethal effects of second-hand smoke. Int J Public Health. doi:10.1007/s00038-014-0550-1
Lazuras L, Zlatev M, Rodafinos A, Eiser JR (2012) Smokers’ compliance with smoke-free policies, and non-smokers’ assertiveness for smoke-free air in the workplace: a study from the Balkans. Int J Public Health 57(5):769–775
Lee S, Ling P, Glantz S (2012) The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries. Cancer Causes Control 23(1):117–129
Liu R, Jiang Y, Travers MJ, Li Q, Hammond SK (2014) Evaluating the efficacy of different smoking policies in restaurants and bars in Beijing, China: a four-year follow-up study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217(1):1–10
Ma J et al (2010) Workplace smoking restrictions in China: results from a six country survey. Tob Control 19:403–409
Minardi V et al (2014) Compliance with the smoking ban in Italy 8 years after its application. Int J Public Health 59(3):549–554
PRS Group (2013) International Country Risk Guide (ICRG), Database. The PRG Group, Montana
Radwan GN, Loffredo CA, Aziz R, Abdel-Aziz N, Labib N (2012) Implementation, barriers and challenges of smoke-free policies in hospitals in Egypt. BMC Res Notes 5:568
Reichmann G, Sommersguter-Reichmann M (2012) The Austrian tobacco act in practice—analysing the effectiveness of partial smoking bans in Austrian restaurants and bars. Health Policy 104(4):304–311
Scoggins A, de Vries H, Conklin A, Hatziandreu E (2009) Analysis to support the impact assessment of the commission’s smoke-free initiatives. Technical report. RAND Corporation
Shipan CR, Volden C (2006) Bottom-up federalism: the diffusion of antismoking policies from U.S. cities to states. Am J Polit Sci 50(4):825–843
Simmons B (2010) Treaty compliance and violation. Annu Rev Polit Sci 13(1):273–296
Studlar DT, Christensen K, Sitasari A (2011) Tobacco control in the EU-15: the role of member states and the European Union. J Eur Public Policy 18(5):728–745
Toshkov D (2012) Policy-making beyond political ideology: the adoption of smoking bans in Europe. Public Adm 91(2):448–468
Tripathy JP, Goel S, Patro BK (2013) Compliance monitoring of prohibition of smoking (under section-4 of COTPA) at a tertiary health-care institution in a smoke-free city of India. Lung India 30(4):312–315
Usmanova G, Mokdad A (2013) Results of the Global Youth Tobacco Survey and implementation of WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in former Soviet Union countries. Int J Public Health 58(2):217–226
WHO (2011) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: warning about the dangers of tobacco. World Health Organization, Geneva
World Bank (2012) World Development Indicators. Database, IBRD
Yong HH et al (2010) Support for and reported compliance among smokers with smoke-free policies in air-conditioned hospitality venues in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the international tobacco control Southeast Asia survey. Asia Pac J Health 22(1):98–109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perkins, R., Neumayer, E. Adoption and compliance in second-hand smoking bans: a global econometric analysis. Int J Public Health 59, 859–866 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0585-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0585-3