Skip to main content
Log in

How do consumers switch between close substitutes when price variation is small? The case of cigarette types

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Spanish Economic Review

Abstract

Past empirical studies report ambiguous results regarding the magnitude and significance of substitution between different types of smoking tobacco. Since all types of tobacco contain nicotine this is quite surprising. Using a 20-year rotating panel data set of Norwegian households and a multinomial logit model, we find evidence that consumers switch between tobacco types: first, estimated price effects on choice probabilities have mostly expected signs, albeit their statistical significance vary across different metrics, second, household characteristics affect tobacco composition significantly. These findings suggest that consumers’ choices are ‘locked’ when the relative price variation is small, as has been the case in most of the data period, but that larger changes could induce large-scale switching between tobacco types. Our conjecture is that there is a latent potential for switching, which will become manifest if prices change sufficiently. Similar considerations are likely to have relevance for other close substitutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen EB (1970) Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators. J R Stat Soc Ser B 32:283–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J Polit Econ 96:675–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biørn E, Jansen ES (1982) Econometrics of incomplete cross-section/time-series data: consumer demand in Norwegian households 1975–1977. Central Bureau of Statistics, Oslo

  • Bretteville-Jensen AL, Biørn E (2003) Heroin consumption, prices and addiction: evidence from self-reported panel data. Scand J Econ 105:661–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE (2000) The economics of smoking. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds). Handbook of Health Economics.vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain G (1984) Panel data. In: Griliches Z, Intriligator MD (eds). Handbook of econometrics. vol. 2. North Holland, Amsterdam,

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch EAC, Spiegelman D (1990) The evaluation of integrals of the form ∫ −∞ f(t)exp( − t 2)dt: application to logistic-normal models. J Am Stat Assoc 85:464–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeland A, Haldorsen T, Andersen A, Tretli S (1996) The impact of smoking habits on lung cancer risk: 28 years’ observation of 26,000 Norwegian men and women. Cancer Causes Control 7:366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans WN, Farrelly MC (1998) The compensating behavior of smokers: taxes, tar, and nicotine. RAND J Econ 29:578–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly MC, Nimsch CT, Hyland A, Cummings M (2004) The effect of higher cigarette prices on tar and nicotine consumption in a cohort of adult smokers. Health Econ 13:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1981) Heterogeneity and state dependence. In: Rosen S (eds). Studies in labor markets. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Honoré BE, Lewbel A (2002) Semiparametric binary choice panel data models without strictly exogenous regressors. Econometrica 70:2053–2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz JL (1997) Bootstrap methods in econometrics: theory and numerical performance. In: Kreps DM, Wallis KF (eds). Advances in economics and econometrics: theory and applications. vol 3.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain DP, Vilcassim NJ, Chintagunta PK (1994) A random-coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 12:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu RE (1984) Anti-smoking publicity, taxation, and the demand for cigarettes. J Health Econ 3:101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lluch C (1974) Expenditure, savings and habit formation. Int Econ Rev 15:786–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles D (2000) The probability that a smoker does not purchase tobacco: a note. Oxford Bull Economics Stat 62:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAG (1993) The NAG Fortran Library Manual, Mark 16. The Numerical Algorithm Group , Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen HS, Rosholm M (1997) The incidence of unemployment identifying quits and layoffs. Working paper No. 97–15, Centre for labor market and social research, University of Aarhus and the Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus

  • Pekurinen M (1989) The demand for tobacco products in Finland. Br J Addict 84:1183–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekurinen M (1991) Economic aspects of smoking. Research Reports 16/1991, National Agency for Welfare and Health, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson B (2004) The “Significance” crisis in psychology and education. J Socioecon 33:609–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson ME, McLeod I (1976) The effects of economic variables upon the demand for cigarettes in Canada. Math Sci 1:121–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangen KR, Biørn E (2001a) Individual heterogeneity and price responses in tobacco consumption: a two-commodity analysis of unbalanced panel data. Discussion Paper No. 294, Statistics Norway, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangen K.R, Biørn E (2001b) Prevalence and substitution effects in tobacco consumption: a discrete choice analysis of panel data. Discussion Paper No. 312, Statistics, Norway, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1997) Tobacco or health? A global status report. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Knut R. Wangen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wangen, K.R., Biørn, E. How do consumers switch between close substitutes when price variation is small? The case of cigarette types. SpanEconRev 8, 239–253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10108-006-9013-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10108-006-9013-z

Keywords

JELClassification

Navigation