Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 21, Issue 1, January 1992, Pages 88-97
Preventive Medicine

An iterative technique for identifying smoking deceivers with application to the Scottish heart health study

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(92)90008-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. The study population consists of 3,977 self-declared nonsmokers for whom complete data on smoking biochemistry were available. Data were obtained from the Scottish Heart Health Study, a random cross-sectional population sample of 40- to 59-year-old men and women.

Methods. Three biochemical markers of smoking (expired-air carbon monoxide, serum thiocyanate, and serum cotinine) are used together to derive optimum cut-points for distinguishing true nonsmokers from self-declared nonsmokers who are smoking deceivers, using an iterative procedure via a computer program.

Results. The cut-points derived are, for carbon monoxide, 6 ppm (sensitivity, 0.81, and specificity, 0.94, when compared with the other two biochemical markers combined), for thiocyanate, 63.4 μmol/liter (sensitivity, 0.75; specificity, 0.92), and, for cotinine, 17.5 ng/ml (sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.98). These cut-points are generally lower than those reported previously, primarily because other studies have taken self-reported smoking status to be the truth. The presence of deceivers among declared nonsmokers would tend to raise the biochemical levels of this group and hence of the cut-points.

Conclusion. The prevalence of smoking deception in the Scottish population is low: the frequency of those at or above all three cut-points is 1.2%, at or above two or more (the preferred definition of a smoking deceiver) is 2.2%, and at or above at least one is 16.4%.

References (26)

  • M Kornitzer et al.

    Belgian heart disease prevention project: Comparison of self-reported smoking behaviour with serum thiocyanate concentrations

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1983)
  • R Pojer et al.

    Carboxyhaemoglobin, cotinine and thiocyanate assay compared for distinguishing smokers from non-smokers

    Clin Chem

    (1984)
  • MJ Jarvis et al.

    Biochemical markers of smoke absorption and self-reported exposure to passive smoking

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1984)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Deception in clinical trials and its impact on recruitment and adherence of study participants

      2018, Contemporary Clinical Trials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Concealment of medical/medication histories have also led to serious and sometimes fatal consequences for research participants [19,32,33]. In general population surveys, concealment of smoking status is generally <5% [34–38]. However, concealment of smoking status is one of the most prevalent forms of deceit by trial participants; in clinical trials involving various patient groups (surgical, cardiac, smoking cessation, asthma and healthy volunteers), the prevalence of concealment of smoking status ranged from 2 to 24% [9,39–44].

    • Cross-sectional and longitudinal association of cigarette smoking with carotid atherosclerosis in Chinese adults

      2009, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, within the context of anti-smoking environment in the world, there is a possibility that under reporting of smoking exists for those who reported no or less amount of smoking, especially in men. In fact, men smokers were more likely to report not smoking or less amount of smoking than women smokers (Woodward and Tunstall-Pedoe, 1992). This kind of misclassification of smoking status and pack-year categories among men should attenuate the association of smoking with carotid atherosclerosis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Department of Applied Statistics, Reading University, P.O. Box 217, Reading, RG6 2AN, United Kingdom.

    View full text