Original article
Differences between smokers, ex-smokers passive smokers and non-smokers

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90101-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The extent to which current, ex- and passive smoking are associated with other risk factors, and the potential for confounding arising from these associations, was studied using a representative sample of 9003 British adults. The distribution of 33 lifestyle factors generally considered associated with adverse health were compared in current smokers, ex-smokers, never smokers living with a smoker (“passive smokers” and other never smokers. Of the 33 risk factors 27 showed a significantly higher prevalence in heavy smokers than in never smokers and only two showed a lower prevalence. For many risk factors, prevalence increased with amount smoked, decreased with time of smoking cessation and was increased in passive smokers. The possible magnitude of bias from confounding by the risk factors is estimated. It is concluded that confounding by multiple risk factors may be an important issue in smoking studies where weak associations are observed. This applies particularly to studies investigating the possible association of passive smoking with various health effects.

References (38)

  • P. Wilson

    Drinking in England and Wales

    (1980)
  • Royal College of Physicians

    Obesity report

    JR Coll Physicians

    (1983)
  • H.J. Eysenck et al.
  • S.G. Haynes et al.

    Relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. I. Methods and risk factors

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1987)
  • J.S. Fry et al.

    Stratified rank tests

    Applied Statistics

    (1988)
  • Office of Population Censuses and Surveys

    Occupational Mortality 1970–1972

    (1978)
  • P.N. Lee

    Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Mortality

    (1992)
  • K. Moser et al.

    Unemployment and mortality

  • Cited by (108)

    • An association of smoking with serum urate and gout: A health paradox

      2018, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, large cohorts were used in several studies that found no association between smoking and serum urate [154,156–158,160,182,192,196,198,200,202,205,211–213,219,222,226,228,230,233]. A further possible explanation for the conflicting results could be that many studies pooled ex-smokers with never-smokers or with current-smokers, despite evidence that ex-smokers, with the exception of ex-smokers who maintained abstinence for over 15–20 years, are different from never-smokers in terms of their risk of chronic diseases and metabolic diseases [277–279]. Of the studies of male cohorts that compared current- to never-smokers, by excluding or assessing ex-smokers separately, many found evidence to indicate that current-smokers have lower levels of serum urate than never-smokers [50,52,62,64,70–72,76,77,81,82,86,89,97,101,102,104,111], while none of these studies reported higher serum urate in current-smokers.

    • Does maternal environmental tobacco smoke interact with social-demographics and environmental factors on congenital heart defects?

      2018, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      While the biological plausibility of interactive relationships with SES and social factors with ETS on CHDs are not clear, it has been reported that economically disadvantaged individuals may be more likely to have greater exposure to adverse risk factors (e.g. smoke more cigarettes), and that this accumulation of risk factors may increase the risk of CHDs compared with those in high SES groups (Rauh et al., 2004; Townsend et al., 1991; Bobak, 2000; Heslop et al., 2001). In addition, active smoking among pregnant women has been associated with lower intake of micronutrients, lower quality diet and high fat diet (Margetts and Jackson, 1993; Rogers et al., 1998; Thornton et al., 1994). Meanwhile, populations with low SES also tend to have lower-quality diets and inadequate intake of trace elements, especially for iron, folic acid, and micronutrients, which are essential for organ generation (Block and Abrams, 1993; Simon et al., 1992).

    • Factors associated with electronic cigarette use among current cigarette-smoking adolescents in the Republic of Korea

      2017, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our findings may be partly because current e-cigarette users are more prone to deviance and less prone to conventionality when compared to former e-cigarette users. Although we could not find empirical studies on e-cigarette use to support this claim, previous studies on cigarette use have revealed that current users are more deviant and less conventional than former users, indicating lower likelihoods of conventional behaviors and greater likelihoods of deviant behaviors among current users (Bonard, Janin-Jacquat, & Michaud, 2001; Thornton, Lee, & Fry, 1994). Our study has two principal strengths, which enhanced the generalizability of findings: we analyzed nationally representative data, while incorporating characteristics of a complex sampling design.

    • Epidemiological evidence on environmental tobacco smoke and cancers other than lung or breast

      2016, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These were discussed in more detail earlier (Lee, 2002) and are only outlined below. Since ETS exposure is associated with dietary and other lifestyle factors associated with adverse health (Dallongeville et al., 1998; Forastiere et al., 2000; Iribarren et al., 2001; Thornton et al., 1994) it is important that studies adequately adjust for these factors, especially where a weak relationship between ETS and incidence of a cancer is seen. The tendency for some current or former smokers to deny having smoked, coupled with the tendency of spouses to have similar smoking habits, is known to bias upward the relationship of spousal smoking to lung cancer (Fry and Lee, 2001; Hackshaw et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2016).

    • Determinants of maternal and neonatal PFAS concentrations: a review

      2023, Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text