Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 37, Issue 4, October 2003, Pages 368-374
Preventive Medicine

Regular article
Relation among stage of change, demographic characteristics, smoking history, and nicotine dependence in an adult German population

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00149-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to provide evidence about the individual intention to quit smoking and accompanying characteristics in a country with a low amount of tobacco control (TC) provisions.

Methods

This study used a random sample of the population aged 18–64 in a German area to make a quantitative estimation of the stages of change to quit smoking among current smokers who had at least one quit attempt (n = 1075).

Results

The rate of those who did not intend to stop smoking (precontemplators) was 76.4%, that of those who intended to quit during the next 6 months (contemplators) was 17.0%, and that of those who intended to quit during the next 4 weeks was 6.6%. The three groups did not differ according to gender or age. Of those who had at least 16 years of education, more were contemplators than were those with fewer years of education. Among those who had somatic complaints or nausea from smoking, who had their first cigarette within 1 h or less after awakening, and who had more quit attempts, more were in the contemplation or preparation stage.

Conclusions

Nicotine dependence may add to contemplating about quitting. The precontemplation rate was substantially higher than in samples from nations or states which show a large amount of TC provisions.

Introduction

A valuable part in the description of the intention to quit smoking is a core construct of the transtheoretical model (TTM) of behavior change [1]: the transition from not planning to quit (precontemplation stage) to intending to quit (contemplation stage), and further on intending to quit in the near future, accompanied by typically having taken some action in the past, e.g., one quit attempt within the past year (preparation stage; [1], [2]). The stages have been replicated in many studies [1], [3], and stage-based interventions have been shown to be effective [4], although the concept of analyzing behavior change by stages has led to considerable debate (e.g., [3]) and aspects of the TTM have been criticized [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. But all together, evidence for the validity of the TTM with respect to smoking is strong [11]. Stage distributions are well-documented for U.S. populations; however, it has been concluded from the evidence existing so far that more studies are particularly needed for non-U.S. populations [11].

Four studies revealed evidence about the stages according to three criteria: representative sample, at least 1000 smokers included, adult age range included 18–64 year olds (Table 1). Among current smokers, precontemplation rates were rather consistent in three of the samples (36.0 to 42.3%) as were rates of individuals in the contemplation or preparation stage [12], [13]. In California, a somewhat lower precontemplation rate was found than in the other samples. In the countries of all four studies, the proportions of current smokers were 25.7% or lower among the population aged 18 or older at the time when the samples were investigated [14].

With respect to the stages of change, only few data about socioeconomic characteristics exist, and even less is known about the smoking behavior itself, such as the number of cigarettes smoked per day, nicotine dependence, and treatment seeking in smoking populations with respect to the stages of change. The distribution within demographic subgroups of smokers in population samples is shown by only one study. According to three samples that were analyzed, there are slightly higher rates of smokers in the preparation stage among males than females [12]. In one of the three samples, there were slightly more precontemplators among smokers at the age of 45 or above than among younger smokers. Compared to people with 12 years or less of education, individuals with more than 12 years of education showed higher rates of contemplation in all three samples and higher rates of contemplation as well as preparation in two of the samples [12].

In contrast to the results from the United States and Australia, hardly any stage distributions have been published from random population samples in other nations. Among smokers in European countries high rates of precontemplation have been revealed, e.g., 74% in a regional population sample aged 18–70 and 72% in a university member sample (82% students) from Switzerland [15] and 59% in a sample recruited by newspaper advertisements in the Netherlands [16]. The large group of precontemplators was subtyped according to long-term plans to quit or never wanting to quit [17]. A cohort study including a representative adult population sample in Germany revealed that there was no substantial increase over time in the rates of contemplation and preparation rates. Over a 6-month period, 78.4% remained in the same stage of change, 11.7% progressed, and 9.9% regressed at least one stage [18]. One factor which may add to explaining the difference between the United States and Australia on the one hand and European nations on the other may be the degree to which the countries provide efforts of tobacco control (TC). Australia and the United States, in particular California, where the highest rates of smokers in contemplation or preparation stage were revealed, show strong TC activities [19], [20], [21], [22]. The strength of TC activities may be estimated based on legislative regulations of tobacco sales, marketing, and use related to tobacco smoking and health [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26].

In Germany, there is only extremely few TC provisions [22], [24], [27], [28], even compared to other European nations. This country is one of the two with the lowest tax on the consumer price for cigarettes (69%; [29]), and it ranks second lowest in the desire to quit smoking and third lowest in quit attempts among the populations [30]. The quit rate in Germany was 35.0% in 1989 and 37.4% in 1995. The rate of current smokers aged 18 or older was estimated to be 31.8% in 1989 and 29.2% in 1995, based on the microcensus carried out in 1989 and 1995. This survey included a sample representative of the German population (n = 67,209 ever smokers aged 18 or older in 1989 and n = 87,440 in 1995; [31]). Current smokers were those individuals who answered “Yes” to the question of whether s/he was currently smoking. In contrast to that, the quit rate in the United States in 1991 was 48.5% [14], and the rate of current smokers aged 18 or older was 24.9% according to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 1991 in Rhode Island and 25.7% according to the NHIS 1991 in the United States [14]. In Australia, the rate of current smokers aged 16 or older in 1995 was 27% in males and 23% in females, and the quit rate was 54% in males and 48% in females [32].

All together, we lack information from well-designed studies using populations which differ in TC provisions and smoker rates from the countries where most of the data have been collected so far. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to provide evidence about the distribution of the stages of change by general demographic characteristics, smoking behavior and history, and nicotine dependence criteria among a random population sample in northern Germany.

Section snippets

Sample

All noninstitutionalized individuals aged 18 to 64 living in the northern German 217,000-inhabitant city of Lübeck and 46 surrounding communities were eligible for the Transitions in Alcohol Consumption and Smoking (TACOS) study [33], [34]. In this region, no particular TC activities were identified compared to Germany in general. A random sample from the communities' residents registration files was drawn. The participation rate was 70.2%, resulting in a sample of 4075 subjects. They

Results

Among the cigarette smokers, 76.4% were in the precontemplation, 17.0% in the contemplation, and 6.6% in the preparation stage. Females did not differ from males (Table 2). According to age, an ANOVA revealed that there were no differences among the three stages (F(2, 1072) = 0.38, not significant). There was a higher rate of contemplators among those who had at least 16 years of education. The effect size was small (ω = 0.12; [41]). There were more smokers in the preparation stage among those

Discussion

General demographic factors show only few differences by stage. Females and males do not differ according to their stage distribution, and increasing age does not automatically lead to an increase of the rates of contemplators and smokers in the preparation stage. No “natural” stage progress seems to occur according to which the rates of smokers in contemplation or preparation stage increase with age due to a growing health concern. Instead, the data reveal that even at the age 45–64 three of

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Grant 01 EB 9801/8 from the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research as part of the study “Transitions of Alcohol Consumption and Smoking” (TACOS) and by Grant IX311a 406.68.43.05 from the Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg–West Pomerania, Germany.

References (43)

  • J.O. Prochaska et al.

    The transtheoretical model of health behavior change

    Am J Health Promo

    (1997)
  • C.C. DiClemente et al.

    The process of smoking cessationan analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1991)
  • J.O. Prochaska et al.

    Comments on Farkas et al.'s “Addiction versus stages of change models in predicting smoking cessation”

    Addiction

    (1996)
  • J.H. Littell et al.

    Stages of change. A critique

    Behav Mod

    (2002)
  • J.F. Etter et al.

    Assessing “stage of change” in current and former smokers

    Addiction

    (2002)
  • S.R. Sutton

    Back to the drawing board? A review of applications of the transtheoretical model to substance use

    Addiction

    (2001)
  • Sutton SR. A critical review of the transtheoretical model applied to smoking cessation. In: Norman P, Abraham C,...
  • N.D. Weinstein et al.

    Stage theories of health behaviorconceptual and methodological issues

    Health Psychol

    (1998)
  • A.J. Farkas et al.

    Addiction versus stages of change models in predicting smoking cessation

    Addiction

    (1996)
  • L. Spencer et al.

    Applying the transtheoretical model to tobacco cessation and preventiona review of literature

    Am J Health Promot

    (2002)
  • G.A. Giovino et al.

    Surveillance for selected tobacco-use behaviors—United States 1900–1994

    Morbid Mortal Rep

    (1994)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Motivating smokers to quit using computer-generated letters that target either reduction or cessation: A population-based randomized controlled trial among smokers who do not intend to quit

      2016, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although effective tobacco control measures have been implemented over the past decades (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2014) a substantial part of the population continues to smoke and does not intend to quit (John et al., 2003; Velicer et al., 1995; Wewers et al., 2003).

    • Stages of change, smoking characteristics, and cotinine concentrations in smokers: Setting priorities for smoking cessation

      2011, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      This was consistent with previous findings from one study (Ahijevych and Parsley, 1999), but not from another (Fava et al., 1995). Our results showed that smokers with the highest CPD tended to be in the precontemplation stage, and smokers with lower CPD tended to be in preparation; this was similar to other studies (DiClemente et al., 1991; Fava et al., 1995; John et al., 2003; Pallonen et al., 1992). Although, in our sample, nicotine dependence was similar among all stages, most smokers in the preparation stage had low dependence.

    • Effects of practitioner-delivered brief counseling and computer-generated tailored letters on cigarettes per day among smokers who do not quit-A quasi-randomized controlled trial

      2010, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Smoking is regarded as the most important contributor to the burden of disease in developed countries (Beaglehole and Yach, 2003). Even so, in Germany and other European countries, in which smoking bans and tobacco tax increases have been implemented only very recently, up to 76% of all smokers do not intend to quit in the foreseeable future (Etter et al., 1997; John et al., 2003b). In the US, a country with a much stronger anti-smoking legislation, this still applies to about 40% of the smoking population (Velicer et al., 1995).

    • Efficacy of genotype notification to Japanese smokers on smoking cessation-An intervention study at workplace

      2010, Cancer Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The tendency in the intervention group was similar to that in the controls. In the previous reports, the stage of change was a good predictor of smoking cessation [26,27]. The cessation rate according to L-myc genotype revealed no statistically significant difference in this study, however, there still seems to be a possibility that genotype notification could be more effective in those with risky genotypes, and further investigation with larger number of study subjects are required to verify this hypothesis.

    • Adolescents' rationalizations to continue smoking: The role of disengagement beliefs and nicotine dependence in smoking cessation

      2009, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, attrition analysis of our sample indicates under-representation of lower educated adolescent male smokers. A lower educational level has been associated with higher levels of nicotine dependence and lower readiness to quit (e.g. Hu, Davies, & Kandel, 2006; John, Meyer, Rumpf, & Hapke, 2003). Nicotine dependence levels may lie somewhat lower in our sample than among the general adolescent smoking population, whereas the readiness to quit may lie somewhat higher.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text