CommentaryUnlocking the corporate documents of British American Tobacco: an invaluable global resource needs radically improved access
References (11)
- et al.
Tobacco industry strategies for influencing European Community tobacco advertising legislation
Lancet
(2002) Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy
Ann Rev Public Health
(2003)- et al.
The cigarette papers
(1996) - et al.
Targeting of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders by the tobacco industry; results from the Minnesota Tobacco Document Depository
Tob Control
(2002) - et al.
Marketing cigarettes with low machine-measured yields
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (37)
Open doorway to truth: Legacy of the Minnesota tobacco trial
2009, Mayo Clinic ProceedingsCitation Excerpt :Although the Minnesota depository was administered by an independent third-party paralegal firm,19 BAT was allowed to manage the daily operations of the Guildford depository.20 In doing so, the company violated the spirit of the Minnesota settlement, a fact documented by both the legislative and judicial branches of government and by journalists and academicians.15,17,21–24 Operations at the Minnesota depository were also affected by BAT's conduct with respect to its obligations to make certain litigation documents publicly available.
The policy response to the smoking and lung cancer connection in the 1950s and 1960s
2006, Historical JournalSpecial Focus 3: Managing the Politics of Earmarked Health Taxes
2023, Health Taxes: Policy and Practice
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.