NoteDo cigarette producers price-discriminate by state? An empirical analysis of local cigarette pricing and taxation
References (40)
- et al.
Oligopoly structure and the incidence of cigarette excise taxes
Journal of Public Economics
(1995) - et al.
Taxation, regulation, and addiction: a demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence
Journal of Health Economics
(1993) - et al.
The effects of excise taxes and regulations on teenage cigarette smoking
Journal of Health Economics
(1991) Relationship of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936–1940
Quarterly Journal of Economics
(1951)Excise taxes, oligopoly coordination, and the advent of discount cigarette brands
- et al.
Churches and church membership in the United States, 1990
(1992) - et al.
An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction
American Economic Review
(1994) - et al.
‘Health scare’, excise taxes, and advertising ban in cigarette demand and supply
Southern Economic Journal
(1985) Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking
Journal of Political Economy
(1991)The theory of monopolistic competition: a re-orientation of the theory of value
(1962)
The 1983 increase in the federal cigarette excise tax
Churches and church membership in the United States, 1971
(1974)
Major local smoking ordinances in the United States
(1989)
The impact of government policy on the US cigarette industry
State responses to fiscal crises: the effects of budgetary institutions and politics
Journal of Political Economy
(1994)
Churches and church membership in the United States, 1980
(1982)
Rand McNally road atlas
(1992)
An empirical analysis of dynamic, nonprice competition in an oligopolistic industry
Rand Journal of Economics
(1988)
Industrial market structure and economic performance
(1990)
Monopoly behavior with intertemporal demands
Cited by (125)
Tax incidence for menthol cigarettes by race: Evidence from Nielsen Homescan data
2023, Journal of Health EconomicsDo sin tax hikes spur cheating in interpersonal exchange?
2022, Accounting, Organizations and SocietyCitation Excerpt :Finally, we also add to the literature on who bears the economic cost of sin tax increases. Prior research has generally shown that cigarette taxes tend to be fully shifted to consumers (Barzel, 1976; Delipalla & O’Donnell, 2001; Hanson & Sullivan, 2009; Johnson, 1978; Keeler et al., 1996; Sumner & Ward, 1981). Our results suggest, however, that in some settings these costs may be passed on to other individuals through fraudulent transactions.
Local excise taxes, sticky prices, and spillovers: evidence from Berkeley’s soda tax
2023, Quantitative Marketing and EconomicsIndividual self-control and collective outcomes: An examination of cigarette addiction and taxes
2023, Scottish Journal of Political Economy
Copyright © 1996 Published by Elsevier B.V.