Research articles
State youth-access tobacco control policies and youth smoking behavior in the United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00196-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Context: State policies aimed at controlling youth access to tobacco are an important component of public health efforts to reduce smoking prevalence among youth and prevent subsequent disease.

Objectives: This study sought to assess the extensiveness of state youth access tobacco control legislation in the United States, describe how state policies changed over a 4-year period, explore how various political and economic characteristics are related to state policies, and determine the relationship of youth smoking behavior to state youth tobacco control policies.

Design: This descriptive and correlational study utilized data from multiple national surveillance, economic, and sociodemographic data sets.

Participants: All 50 states and the District of Columbia provided economic and political data. A standard tobacco-control policy score was developed by an expert panel for each state. Aggregated state-level measures of youth smoking behavior were provided by 79,491 youth in 33 states and the District of Columbia.

Main Outcome Measures: Included were extent of state tobacco control policies and changes over time, relationship between state political and economic characteristics and tobacco control policies, and relationship between state policies and youth smoking behavior.

Results: State policy scores increased in variability and in mean value over the 4-year period, from a mean score of 7.2 in 1993 to 9.0 in 1996. State policy scores were significantly correlated with several state political and economic variables. States with more extensive tobacco control policies had significantly lower youth smoking rates. There was some evidence that a strong state tobacco economy may limit the effectiveness of tobacco control policies on youth smoking rates.

Conclusions: It is possible to reliably measure the extent to which states are achieving important public health goals in limiting youth access to tobacco products. Comprehensive state tobacco control policies are important for increasing prevention and cessation of smoking among youth.

Introduction

C igarette smoking is the “single most important preventable cause of premature death,”1 accounting for one of every five American deaths.2 Despite the overall decline in smoking over the past 40 years and decades of public health messages on the health risks of smoking, more than 1 million Americans become new smokers each year, most of whom are adolescents.1, 3 In 1997, 70% of high school students had tried cigarettes at some time in their lives, and 36% were current smokers.3 The proportion of current youth smokers increased from 28% in 1991 to 36% in 1997—an increase of almost 30% in just 6 years.3

Tobacco control policies work by altering the legal, economic, social, and physical environments that shape tobacco-use behavior. Specifically, they can influence smoking behavior among youth by limiting access and distribution of tobacco products, reducing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke through clean indoor air regulations, or reducing exposure to tobacco advertising and promotion. There is an emerging consensus that implementing and enforcing tobacco control policies will prove to be the most effective and efficient means to prevent youth smoking.4, 5 They can be less expensive to enact relative to preventive interventions, and generally reach much larger youth populations.6, 7

In 1995, there were 1238 state laws addressing tobacco use in effect, and that number has certainly increased since then.5, 8, 9 Although there are examples of empirical evaluations of one or two specific tobacco control policies (e.g., retail sales restrictions to minors),10, 11, 12 to the present there has been no comprehensive empirical evaluation of the sets of policies implemented by various states. In fact, most of the literature on tobacco control policy consists of discussion or theory pieces, focusing most often on policy proposals,7, 13, 14 or descriptions of the political process of policy implementation.15, 16 It is now time to assess the extent to which states are actually implementing sound tobacco control policies and, more importantly, to start evaluating the effect that these policies may be having on youth smoking.

Section snippets

Study context

In 1989, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) developed the State Cancer Legislative Database (SCLD) to track laws related to cancer control. Recently a technical advisory committee, using youth-access policy guidelines developed by the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST), developed a rating system based on the SCLD data to evaluate the extensiveness of state laws restricting youth access to tobacco.17 This rating system represents the first empirical instrument that can be used to

Measures

This study relies on state-level data from three domains: state tobacco control policies, youth smoking behavior, and state economic and political characteristics.

Description of SCLD scores

Table 3 ranks each state plus the District of Columbia by its 1996 SCLD policy score. New York, Connecticut, California, and Rhode Island stand out as having the highest scores for that year. North Carolina has the lowest score and is the only state to show a decrease in the SCLD scores from 1993 to 1996 (see second column in Table 3). Examination of the other variables listed in the table suggest that the extent of the state tobacco control policies is not related to other economic and

State characteristics associated with SCLD scores

ANOVA and regression analyses were used to examine the relationship of state SCLD policy scores to important economic and political characteristics. Because of the small sample size, effect size statistics (eta2 and r2) are reported in the tables as well as significance levels.

Bivariate analysis

Regression analyses were performed to examine associations between 1996 state tobacco control policy scores and the five youth smoking variables. The strongest association between state tobacco control policy and youth smoking was observed for the relationship between 1996 state SCLD scores and prevalence of current smokers (r=−0.36, r2=0.13, p=0.04). Figure 1 shows the relationship between SCLD score and teen smoking prevalence. The equation for the fitted regression line indicates that for

Discussion

As noted elsewhere, health policies are frequently implemented, yet much less commonly evaluated.28 Our study is among the first to systematically assess the extensiveness of state youth tobacco control policies and the possible effects of those policies. The important findings of the current study are summarized as follows:

  • 1.

    States differed dramatically in the extensiveness of their youth tobacco control policies, from North Carolina’s 1996 SCLD score of 1 to New York’s score of 21 (out of 39).

  • 2.

References (32)

  • E.A. Klonoff et al.

    An instrument for assessing the quality of tobacco-control policiesthe ACT-L scale

    Prev Med

    (1998)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the health consequences of smoking—25 years of progress: a...
  • J.M. McGinnis et al.

    Actual causes of death in the United States

    JAMA

    (1993)
  • Tobacco use among high school students—Unites States, 1997

    MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep

    (1998)
  • P.D. Jacobson et al.

    Tobacco control lawsimplementation and enforcement

    (1997)
  • K.E. Warner

    Public policy issues

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing tobacco use among young people: a report of the Surgeon...
  • Scheg KE. Public policy: effective treatment for tobacco disease. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1996:51:52–56,...
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State laws on tobacco control—United States, 1995. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep...
  • L.A. Jason et al.

    Active enforcement of cigarette control laws in the prevention of cigarette sales to minors

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • N.A. Rigotti et al.

    The effect of enforcing tobacco-sales laws on adolescents’ access to tobacco and smoking behavior

    N Engl J Med

    (1997)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Minors’ access to tobacco—Missouri, 1992, and Texas, 1993. MMWR Morb Mort...
  • R.C. Brownson et al.

    Environmental and policy interventions to control tobacco use and prevent cardiovascular disease

    Health Educ Q

    (1995)
  • T.E. Novotny et al.

    The public health practice of tobacco controllessons learned and directions for the states in the 1990s

    Annu Rev Public Health

    (1992)
  • Glantz SA, Begay ME. Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California....
  • A.O. Goldstein et al.

    State legislators’ attitudes and voting intentions toward tobacco control legislation

    Am J Public Health

    (1997)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Development of a School Nutrition-Environment State Policy Classification System (SNESPCS)

      2007, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Combining SNESPCS with the PE policy system14 provides data, beginning with a 2003 baseline, on the variability of a range of policies which have an impact in structuring school environments to support healthy behaviors. Linking the policy data with other data has significant potential for understanding how these policies affect the school environment, and potentially social norms and behavioral outcomes among children as similar efforts have been successful in helping understand the impact of tobacco consumption and related behaviors.69–71 Furthermore, combining the knowledge of school policy influences with measures of home, neighborhood, media, and other influences can provide a more comprehensive understanding of children’s dietary behaviors.

    • Researchers and policymakers: Travelers in parallel universes

      2006, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text