Research Articles
Smoking relapse prevention during pregnancy: A trial of coordinated advice from physicians and individual counseling

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00029-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction: Our objective was to examine the efficacy of physicians’ advice and referral to individual counseling in preventing relapse to smoking among women who were smokers early in pregnancy, but quit prior to their first prenatal visit.

Design: A randomized controlled trial of prompted physician’s advice and individual relapse prevention counseling during pregnancy compared to usual physician advice. Smoking status was assessed by self-report, exhaled carbon monoxide, and urinary cotinine during pregnancy and by self-report 1 year postpartum.

Results: There were no significant differences in relapse rates between the intervention and usual-care groups during pregnancy, nor at 1 year postpartum. Relapse rates were 23% in both groups at the 36-week visit, and 32% and 22%, respectively, 1 year postpartum. Younger age, higher motivation to resume smoking, and higher levels of exhaled carbon monoxide at the first prenatal visit were predictive of relapse to smoking during pregnancy. With the conservative assumption that all those lost to follow-up relapsed, the combined 1-year postpartum relapse rate, 51%, was 17 percentage points lower than we observed in an earlier relapse prevention trial, and 15 percentage points lower than that observed nationally a decade earlier.

Conclusion: Prompting physicians to provide supportive advice combined with referral to individual relapse prevention counseling did not reduce smoking relapse rates during pregnancy, or postpartum. However, the level of attention paid to smoking by physicians in both intervention and usual-care groups during pregnancy may have contributed to the relatively low relapse rates seen 1-year postpartum.

Introduction

About 25% of women smokers stop smoking when they become pregnant.1, 2, 3 Most of these women remain abstinent during the remainder of their pregnancy, but 15%–30% relapse during this time.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Four controlled trials of the efficacy of different interventions designed to prevent relapse to smoking during prenatal care have shown no effect in reducing relapse rates during pregnancy.5, 6, 7, 8 Two of these trials examined the efficacy of different pregnancy-specific self-help materials,5, 6 while the other two examined the efficacy of individual relapse prevention counseling and other supportive materials.7, 8

Although women are seen regularly for prenatal care during the course of pregnancy, physicians and nurse midwives rarely mention smoking issues with women who smoked early in pregnancy, but quit prior to their first prenatal visit.8 Prenatal visits offer repeated opportunities to advise and counsel women to stay quit and to address concerns women may have in their efforts to remain abstinent from smoking. This paper describes the results of a trial of prompted advice given by trained physicians followed by on-site referral to individual relapse prevention counseling during prenatal care.

Section snippets

Methods

This randomized controlled trial was undertaken in the offices of the University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology, among women receiving their prenatal care through the Maternal Infant Care (MIC) clinic, a state-supported clinic for underinsured or uninsured women, or through the Adolescent clinic. In the MIC clinic, prenatal care is provided by obstetric and family practice residents under the supervision of a faculty member and in the Adolescent clinic by an obstetrician and nurse

Comparability of groups

At baseline, there were no significant differences between the intervention and usual-care groups for any of the variables measured among those also interviewed at the 36-week follow-up (see Table 1, Table 2).

Ninety-six percent of the women had high levels of motivation to stay quit during pregnancy, while a much smaller proportion, 11%, also had high levels of motivation to resume smoking. A large proportion of women, 94%, had high levels of confidence in being able to stay quit during the

Discussion

We were unable to show any effect of brief physician advice supported by individual relapse prevention counseling on multiple occasions in preventing relapse to smoking during pregnancy. During the postpartum follow-up, further relapse occurred in both groups, but with no significant difference between them. However, even the conservative estimate of the postpartum relapse rate, 51% for the combined groups, including all those lost to follow-up as smokers, was substantially less than we

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to the late Sandra S. Lepage, MSN, for all she did to help intervention group participants maintain their nonsmoking behavior. We also thank Jane E. Crammond, RN, for enrolling women into this study and conducting the interviews. Support for this study was provided by the National Institutes of Health, grant numbers HL29957 and CA22435.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (61)

  • A systematic review of behaviour change techniques within interventions to prevent return to smoking postpartum

    2019, Addictive Behaviors
    Citation Excerpt :

    The majority of studies (25 trials) were conducted in the USA,(Allen et al., 2016; Brandon et al., 2012; Cummins et al., 2016; El-Mohandes et al., 2011; Ershoff et al., 1995; Forray et al., 2016; Forray & Waters, 2015; Kendrick et al., 1995; Kientz & Kupperschmidt, 2005; Levine et al., 2016; Lillington et al., 1995; McBride et al., 1999; McBride et al., 2004; Morasco et al., 2006; Mullen et al., 2001; Pbert et al., 2004; Petersen et al., 1992; Pollak et al., 2016; Reitzel et al., 2010; Ruger et al., 2008; Secker-Walker et al., 1995; Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Strecher et al., 2000; Suplee, 2005; Winickoff, Healey, Regan, et al., 2010) two in Canada,(Edwards & Sims-Jones, 1997; Johnson et al., 2000) two in the UK,(Hajek et al., 2001; Thornton, 1997) and three elsewhere in Europe (Germany, Spain and Poland)(Hannover et al., 2009; Jimenez-Muro et al., 2013; Polanska et al., 2004); all notably high income countries. Less than a third of interventions targeted lower socioeconomic groups or ethnic minorities (El-Mohandes et al., 2011; Kientz & Kupperschmidt, 2005; Levine et al., 2016; Lillington et al., 1995; Morasco et al., 2006; Reitzel et al., 2010; Ruger et al., 2008; Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Suplee, 2005; Thornton, 1997). The details of participants, intervention, comparison group, outcome measures, main findings and BCTs identified are described in Supplementary Table 2.

  • A proactive smoking cessation intervention in postpartum women

    2013, Midwifery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several previous studies that evaluated interventions during the postpartum obtained contradictory results, partly due to the different methodologies used for the design and the characteristics of the intervention (Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Mullen, 2004; Solomon and Quinn, 2004; Goldenberg et al., 2000). These differences include the intensity of the intervention (from self-help materials to visits) (Levitt et al., 2007; Hannöver et al., 2009), the staff who run it (paediatricians, midwives, nurses) (Severson et al., 1997; Hajek et al., 2001; Petersen et al., 2009) or the follow-up and the evaluation of the results, which vary from biochemical validation of abstinence to self-reported status (Secker-Walker et al., 1998; McBride et al., 1999; Valanis et al., 2001). Our study was proposed as a psycho-social intervention with a greater intensity than in a usual brief intervention; following the latest recommendations regarding smoking cessation treatments for pregnant women (Fiore et al., 2008).

  • Health care providers' engagement in smoking cessation with pregnant smokers

    2010, JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
  • Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation

    2019, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text