Research ArticlesSmoking relapse prevention during pregnancy: A trial of coordinated advice from physicians and individual counseling
Introduction
About 25% of women smokers stop smoking when they become pregnant.1, 2, 3 Most of these women remain abstinent during the remainder of their pregnancy, but 15%–30% relapse during this time.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Four controlled trials of the efficacy of different interventions designed to prevent relapse to smoking during prenatal care have shown no effect in reducing relapse rates during pregnancy.5, 6, 7, 8 Two of these trials examined the efficacy of different pregnancy-specific self-help materials,5, 6 while the other two examined the efficacy of individual relapse prevention counseling and other supportive materials.7, 8
Although women are seen regularly for prenatal care during the course of pregnancy, physicians and nurse midwives rarely mention smoking issues with women who smoked early in pregnancy, but quit prior to their first prenatal visit.8 Prenatal visits offer repeated opportunities to advise and counsel women to stay quit and to address concerns women may have in their efforts to remain abstinent from smoking. This paper describes the results of a trial of prompted advice given by trained physicians followed by on-site referral to individual relapse prevention counseling during prenatal care.
Section snippets
Methods
This randomized controlled trial was undertaken in the offices of the University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology, among women receiving their prenatal care through the Maternal Infant Care (MIC) clinic, a state-supported clinic for underinsured or uninsured women, or through the Adolescent clinic. In the MIC clinic, prenatal care is provided by obstetric and family practice residents under the supervision of a faculty member and in the Adolescent clinic by an obstetrician and nurse
Comparability of groups
At baseline, there were no significant differences between the intervention and usual-care groups for any of the variables measured among those also interviewed at the 36-week follow-up (see Table 1, Table 2).
Ninety-six percent of the women had high levels of motivation to stay quit during pregnancy, while a much smaller proportion, 11%, also had high levels of motivation to resume smoking. A large proportion of women, 94%, had high levels of confidence in being able to stay quit during the
Discussion
We were unable to show any effect of brief physician advice supported by individual relapse prevention counseling on multiple occasions in preventing relapse to smoking during pregnancy. During the postpartum follow-up, further relapse occurred in both groups, but with no significant difference between them. However, even the conservative estimate of the postpartum relapse rate, 51% for the combined groups, including all those lost to follow-up as smokers, was substantially less than we
Acknowledgements
We are most grateful to the late Sandra S. Lepage, MSN, for all she did to help intervention group participants maintain their nonsmoking behavior. We also thank Jane E. Crammond, RN, for enrolling women into this study and conducting the interviews. Support for this study was provided by the National Institutes of Health, grant numbers HL29957 and CA22435.
References (18)
- et al.
Women who stop smoking spontaneously prior to prenatal care and predictors of relapse before delivery
Addict Behav
(1991) - et al.
Relapse prevention among women who stop smoking early in pregnancya randomized clinical trial of a self-help intervention
Am J Prev Med
(1995) - et al.
Smoking during pregnancy
NZ Med J
(1979) - et al.
Comparing the prevalence of smoking in pregnant and nonpregnant women, 1985 to 1986
JAMA
(1989) - et al.
A review of smoking in pregnancyeffects on pregnancy outcomes and cessation effects
Annu Rev Pub Health
(1993) - et al.
Smoking reduction during pregnancy by a program of self-help and clinical support
Obstet Gynecol
(1992) - et al.
Postpartum smoking
- et al.
Smoking relapse prevention counseling during prenatal and early postnatal care
Am J Prev Med
(1995) - et al.
Training obstetric and family practice residents to give smoking cessation advice during prenatal care
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1992)
Cited by (61)
A systematic review of behaviour change techniques within interventions to prevent return to smoking postpartum
2019, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :The majority of studies (25 trials) were conducted in the USA,(Allen et al., 2016; Brandon et al., 2012; Cummins et al., 2016; El-Mohandes et al., 2011; Ershoff et al., 1995; Forray et al., 2016; Forray & Waters, 2015; Kendrick et al., 1995; Kientz & Kupperschmidt, 2005; Levine et al., 2016; Lillington et al., 1995; McBride et al., 1999; McBride et al., 2004; Morasco et al., 2006; Mullen et al., 2001; Pbert et al., 2004; Petersen et al., 1992; Pollak et al., 2016; Reitzel et al., 2010; Ruger et al., 2008; Secker-Walker et al., 1995; Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Strecher et al., 2000; Suplee, 2005; Winickoff, Healey, Regan, et al., 2010) two in Canada,(Edwards & Sims-Jones, 1997; Johnson et al., 2000) two in the UK,(Hajek et al., 2001; Thornton, 1997) and three elsewhere in Europe (Germany, Spain and Poland)(Hannover et al., 2009; Jimenez-Muro et al., 2013; Polanska et al., 2004); all notably high income countries. Less than a third of interventions targeted lower socioeconomic groups or ethnic minorities (El-Mohandes et al., 2011; Kientz & Kupperschmidt, 2005; Levine et al., 2016; Lillington et al., 1995; Morasco et al., 2006; Reitzel et al., 2010; Ruger et al., 2008; Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Suplee, 2005; Thornton, 1997). The details of participants, intervention, comparison group, outcome measures, main findings and BCTs identified are described in Supplementary Table 2.
Positive parenting behaviors in women who spontaneously quit smoking during pregnancy: Clues to putative targets for preventive interventions
2018, Neurotoxicology and TeratologyA proactive smoking cessation intervention in postpartum women
2013, MidwiferyCitation Excerpt :Several previous studies that evaluated interventions during the postpartum obtained contradictory results, partly due to the different methodologies used for the design and the characteristics of the intervention (Secker-Walker et al., 1998; Mullen, 2004; Solomon and Quinn, 2004; Goldenberg et al., 2000). These differences include the intensity of the intervention (from self-help materials to visits) (Levitt et al., 2007; Hannöver et al., 2009), the staff who run it (paediatricians, midwives, nurses) (Severson et al., 1997; Hajek et al., 2001; Petersen et al., 2009) or the follow-up and the evaluation of the results, which vary from biochemical validation of abstinence to self-reported status (Secker-Walker et al., 1998; McBride et al., 1999; Valanis et al., 2001). Our study was proposed as a psycho-social intervention with a greater intensity than in a usual brief intervention; following the latest recommendations regarding smoking cessation treatments for pregnant women (Fiore et al., 2008).
Health care providers' engagement in smoking cessation with pregnant smokers
2010, JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal NursingPrimary Care–Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management After Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: a Narrative Review
2022, Journal of General Internal MedicineRelapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation
2019, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews