Research Article
National and State-Specific Sales and Prices for Electronic Cigarettes—U.S., 2012–2013

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.003Get rights and content

Introduction

The growing market for electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) has been widely reported in the media, but very little objective data exist in the scientific literature, and no data have been published on state-specific trends in prices or sales. Our objective is to assess state-specific annual sales and average prices for e-cigarettes in the U.S.

Methods

Commercial retail scanner data were used to assess total dollar sales and average price per unit for disposable e-cigarettes, starter kits, and cartridge refills for selected states and the total U.S. during 2012−2013. Data were analyzed in 2014. Data were available for convenience stores (29 states) and food, drug, and mass merchandisers (44 states).

Results

In convenience stores, dollar sales increased markedly during 2012−2013: 320.8% for disposable e-cigarettes, 72.4% for starter kits, and 82% for cartridges. In food, drug, and mass merchandisers, dollar sales increased 49.5% for disposable e-cigarettes, 89.4% for starter kits, and 126.2% for cartridges. Average prices across all product categories increased in convenience stores and decreased in food, drug, and mass merchandisers. Sales and prices varied substantially across states included in the analyses.

Conclusions

Sales of all e-cigarette device types grew considerably in convenience stores and food, drug, and mass merchandisers during 2012−2013. The market for e-cigarettes is growing rapidly, resulting in dynamic sales and price changes that vary across the U.S. Continued state-specific surveillance of the e-cigarette market is warranted.

Introduction

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs), including electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), are battery-powered devices that heat liquid in a cartridge to deliver an inhaled dose of nicotine and other additives. Although the impact of e-cigarettes on public health is unclear,1, 2 awareness and use has increased markedly since being introduced into the U.S. in 2007.3, 4, 5, 6 During 2011–2013, ever use of e-cigarettes increased from 1.4% to 3.0% among middle school students and from 4.7% to 11.9% among high school students.7 Similarly, ever use of e-cigarettes has increased among adults, from 3.3% in 2010 to 8.5% in 2013, with higher prevalence among current (36.5%) and former (9.6%) cigarette smokers than never smokers (1.2%) in 2013.8 Despite the low proportion of tobacco product sales accounted for by e-cigarettes, monitoring e-cigarette sales is warranted, given the rapid increase in e-cigarette use and the continuing decline in conventional cigarette sales.9

Several factors may be driving the surge in popularity of e-cigarettes. First,10 e-cigarettes have been promoted as socially acceptable alternatives in situations where conventional tobacco smoking is not allowed.11, 12 Second, e-cigarettes have been promoted as safer alternatives to conventional tobacco products11 and are used as a cessation aid by consumers.13 There is, however, no conclusive scientific evidence that e-cigarettes promote long-term cessation, and the products are not currently approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for smoking cessation.14 Third, annual advertising expenditures for e-cigarettes across multiple channels tripled from $6.4 million in 2011 to $18.3 million in 2012, including advertising on TV,15 where advertising of conventional cigarettes has been banned since 1971.16 Smokers are particularly receptive to e-cigarette TV advertisements.17 Increasing cigarette prices are associated with decreasing cigarette consumption,18 and recent evidence suggests that e-cigarette sales are also price sensitive.19 Fourth, e-cigarettes are available in numerous configurations, and many e-cigarettes contain interchangeable components, allowing users to modify the device and customize its performance.20 Finally, e-cigarettes are available in a variety of flavors, including fruit, alcohol, and chocolate, which are banned in conventional cigarettes in the U.S.21

E-cigarettes may have lower potential harm to the individual user than smoked tobacco22 and may aid in short-term smoking cessation23; however, concerns exist, including the potential for e-cigarettes to promote continued smoking of cigarettes among current smokers, promote relapse among former smokers, encourage uptake of e-cigarettes among nonsmokers, and renormalize smoking behaviors.24 The current dearth of objective data on the effects of e-cigarettes on individuals, populations, and the environment presents a challenge for protecting the public’s health.25, 26 On April 24, 2014, the FDA proposed to extend its tobacco regulatory authority to include e-cigarettes, but implementation could take several years.27 However, some states have implemented policies to prevent youth access to e-cigarettes, avoid renormalization of tobacco use, and preserve clean indoor air standards. As of November 2014, a total of 40 states regulate youth access to e-cigarettes, and three states prohibit e-cigarette use in indoor areas of worksites, restaurants, and bars.28 Currently, only two states tax e-cigarettes: Minnesota applies a tax to some e-cigarettes equal to 95% of the wholesale price,29 and North Carolina applies a tax of 5 cents per milliliter of nicotine liquid.30

Although the increasing market for e-cigarettes has been widely reported in the media,31, 32, 33 very few data exist in the scientific literature documenting sales and prices of e-cigarettes in the U.S., and no data have yet been published on state-specific trends in these measures. To address this gap, this study assessed state-specific sales and prices of disposable e-cigarettes, starter kits, and replacement cartridges.

Section snippets

Data Source

Data were from a custom-designed database of retail scanner data provided by Information Resources, Inc. The data contain dollar and unit sales in convenience stores (C-stores) and food, drug, and mass merchandisers combined (FDMs) for 2012 and 2013. Dollar and unit sales are reported at the item level, defined by a Universal Product Code (UPC). Information compiled for each item includes UPC, brand name, product type, and number of items per unit (e.g., a single unit might contain three

Results

Table 1, Table 2 report annual dollar sales for disposable e-cigarettes, starter kits, and cartridge refills in C-stores and FDMs, respectively. Sales of disposable e-cigarettes increased in all 29 states with C-stores, while sales of starter kits and cartridge refills increased in 26 states. Across states, the average change in C-store sales was 345.7% for disposable e-cigarettes (minimum=39.7% [South Carolina], maximum=708.5% [Arkansas]), 110.3% for starter kits (minimum=−16.9% [Arizona],

Discussion

This study is the first state-level report of sales and prices for e-cigarettes in the U.S. During 2012−2013, sales of all e-cigarette product categories increased substantially in both C-stores and FDMs in nearly every state for which data are available. Nationally, sales of disposable e-cigarettes, starter kits, and cartridge refills totaled almost $642 million in 2013 in C-stores and FDMs combined, a 150% increase from 2012. Disposable e-cigarettes accounted for 59% of total sales

Conclusions

We used a novel state-level retail scanner data set to estimate sales and prices for e-cigarettes in C-stores and FDMs. The findings reveal that e-cigarette sales grew rapidly, whereas average prices generally stayed constant or fell. Disposable e-cigarettes are the fastest-growing product category. These results describe e-cigarette sales and prices prior to widespread implementation of e-cigarette regulations. As such, they can be considered a baseline against which to measure change

Acknowledgments

Support was provided by CDC, Office on Smoking and Health. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC. All estimates and analyses in this paper based on Information Resources, Inc. data are by the author and not by Information Resources, Inc.

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

References (43)

  • A.E. Kim et al.

    E-cigarette advertising expenditures in the U.S., 2011−2012

    Am J Prev Med

    (2014)
  • P. Callahan-Lyon

    Electronic cigarettes: human health effects

    Tob Control

    (2014)
  • E.L. Durmowicz

    The impact of electronic cigarettes on the paediatric population

    Tob Control

    (2014)
  • K. Choi et al.

    Characteristics associated with awareness, perceptions, and use of electronic nicotine delivery systems among young U.S. Midwestern adults

    Am J Public Health

    (2013)
  • A.K. Regan et al.

    Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the ‘e-cigarette’ in the USA

    Tob Control

    (2013)
  • J.L. Pearson et al.

    E-cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in U.S. adults

    Am J Public Health

    (2012)
  • J.K. Pepper et al.

    Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review

    Tob Control

    (2014)
  • CDC. Tobacco use among middle and high school students—United States, 2013

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2014)
  • B.A. King et al.

    Trends in Awareness and Use of Electronic Cigarettes Among U.S. Adults, 2010-2013

    Nicotine Tob Res

    (2015)
  • W. Orzechowski et al.

    The Tax Burden on Tobacco Historical Compilation Volume 47, 2012

    (2013)
  • American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. Chronological table of U.S. population protected by 100% smokefree state or...
  • Cahn Z, Siegel M. Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: a step forward or a repeat of...
  • L. Curry et al.

    E-cigarettes made especially for inmates

    Tob Control

    (2014)
  • L. Dawkins et al.

    ‘Vaping’ profiles and preferences: an online survey of electronic cigarette users

    Addiction

    (2013)
  • Food and Drug Administration. FDA 101: Smoking cessation products. 2014....
  • K.E. Warner et al.

    The cigarette advertising broadcast ban and magazine coverage of smoking and health

    J Public Health Policy

    (1989)
  • A.E. Kim et al.

    Adult smokers’ receptivity to a television advert for electronic nicotine delivery systems

    Tob Control

    (2015)
  • C.A. Gallet et al.

    Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities

    Health Econ

    (2003)
  • Huang J, Tauras J, Chaloupka FJ. The impact of price and tobacco control policies on the demand for electronic nicotine...
  • C.J. Brown et al.

    Electronic cigarettes: product characterisation and design considerations

    Tob Control

    (2014)
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Enforcement of General Tobacco Standard Special Rule for Cigarettes

    Fed Regist

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text