Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 201, 1 August 2019, Pages 85-93
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Review
The rise of e-cigarettes, pod mod devices, and JUUL among youth: Factors influencing use, health implications, and downstream effects

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • E-cigarette use (vaping) is increasingly common among youth.

  • “Pod mod” e-cigarettes, like JUUL, are the most common devices used by youth.

  • Clinicians and families are often unsure about how to discuss vaping with youth.

  • Answers to common questions regarding e-cigarettes and JUUL are provided.

Abstract

Background

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) were first introduced in the U.S. market in 2006, with the more recent evolution of "pod-mod" e-cigarettes such as JUUL introduced in 2015. Although marketed as a smoking cessation tool, e-cigarettes are rarely used for this purpose in youth. This review aims to synthesize the literature regarding e-cigarette use among youth, and provides a resource for clinicians, educators, and families that helps answer commonly asked questions about e-cigarettes.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO search was performed using search terms "Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems," "e cigarettes," "e-cigarettes," "electronic cigarettes," "vaping," "JUUL," "e-cigs," and "vape pens." Search results were filtered to only include those related to adolescents and young adults.

Results

E-cigarette use among youth is common, with rates of use increasing from 1.5% in 2011 to 20.8% in 2018. Pod mod devices such as JUUL have gained favor among youth for their sleek design, user-friendly function, desirable flavors, and ability to be used discreetly in places where smoking is forbidden. Adolescents are often uninformed about the constituents of e-cigarettes, and little is known about the long-term effects of e-cigarettes. Studies have suggested a "gateway" effect for combustible cigarettes and cannabis use.

Conclusions

E-cigarette use is becoming increasingly common among youth, leading to a myriad of questions and concerns from providers, educators, and family members. More research is needed to determine the ultimate public health impact of e-cigarette use. The authors provide a summary table of frequently asked questions in order to help clarify these common concerns.

Introduction

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) first entered the U.S. market in 2006, acclaimed as a smoking cessation tool and a safer alternative to smoking (Cahn and Siegel, 2011; Hon, 2013). E-cigarettes have evolved from early generation cigarette lookalikes (cigalikes), to modifiable tank-style e-cigarettes, to the latest, more inconspicuous device type known as pod mods or “pods.” Among pod mods, the most well known is JUUL, which was first introduced in 2015. JUUL is currently the most popular retail e-cigarette brand in the USA, accounting for 76% of the retail e-cigarette market at the end of 2018 (Craver, 2019; Huang et al., 2019). JUUL has become so popular among youth that the term “JUULing” has become synonymous with “vaping” among teens and young adults (Teitell, 2017). JUUL devices are small, rechargeable, battery-powered e-cigarettes which aerosolize liquid solutions containing glycerol, propylene glycol, natural oils, extracts and flavor, nicotine, and benzoic acid (JUUL, 2019). Modern e-cigarettes and pod mod devices like JUUL have become a more socially acceptable alternative to combustible cigarettes among adolescents and young adults, and have become popular among this age group as a result of (1) sleek designs, (2) user-friendly functions, (3) less aversive smoking experiences, (4) desirable flavors, and (5) the ability to be used discreetly in places where smoking is forbidden (Allem et al., 2018; Barrington-Trimis and Leventhal, 2018; Kavuluru et al., 2019; Kinouani et al., 2017; McKeganey et al., 2018; Pepper et al., 2016; Ramamurthi et al., 2018; Yingst et al., 2018).

JUUL has been described as the “iPhone of e-cigarettes” (Radding, 2015) due to its modern and user-friendly design that requires only sliding a flavor pod (nicotine cartridge) into the device before use, a significant improvement over previous models of e-cigarettes (Barrington-Trimis and Leventhal, 2018). JUUL utilizes protonated nicotine, which the company claims provides a more satisfying experience to the user by reducing aversive experiences of taste, smell, and throat irritation (Barrington-Trimis and Leventhal, 2018; Bowen and Xing, 2015). The appealing flavorings available (e.g., mango, fruit medley, menthol) in JUUL (JUUL, 2019) can mask unwanted tastes and smells, and are often cited as a reason for experimentation among young JUUL users (Ayers et al., 2017;Chen, 2018 Kavuluru et al., 2019; Kong et al., 2015). The size of JUUL and its resemblance to a USB flash drive allow it to be easily concealed from authority figures and discreetly used in places where smoking is forbidden, also known as “stealth vaping” (Allem et al., 2018; Kavuluru et al., 2019; Ramamurthi et al., 2018; Yingst et al., 2018). Given the novel user experience, appealing flavors, and product design of JUUL and other pod mod devices, they may be more appealing to youth than prior e-cigarette products. In one recent report, 80% of 15–24 year olds who reported that they had ever tried JUUL were also past 30-day users (Willett et al., 2019), suggesting that youth who try JUUL are highly likely to continue using it.

This review examines the rise of use in e-cigarettes and pod mod devices such as JUUL, and discusses factors which are implicated in their initiation and sustainment of use. The perception of these products among adolescents and young adults will also be examined, as well as current research available regarding the potential benefits of e-cigarettes and pod mod devices as a harm reduction model for those who use combustible cigarettes. Alternatively, this review will also examine the risk of e-cigarette use as a “gateway” to combustible cigarette use and cannabis use. This review is meant to serve as an updated, meaningful summary of adolescent e-cigarette and pod mod use from a clinical perspective, with Table 1 as a general reference to commonly asked questions that many researchers, providers, educators, and families often have regarding e-cigarettes.

Section snippets

Methods

Pubmed, Scopus, and PsycINFO search was performed using search terms "Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems," "e cigarettes," "e-cigarettes," “vaping,” “electronic cigarettes,” “JUUL,” “e-cigs,” and “vape pens.” Search results were filtered to only include those related to adolescents and young adults. Review of peer-reviewed articles included original research articles and review articles pertinent to adolescent e-cigarette, vaping, and pod mod use.

Epidemiology and rising prevalence of use

Although there recently has been a significant decline in youth combustible cigarette use, the overall use of nicotine products among youth has increased as a result of e-cigarettes and pod mod devices such as JUUL (Miech et al., 2018; Mirbolouk et al., 2018). In the United States, past 30-day vaping among high school students has risen from 1.5% in 2011 to 11.7% in 2017 to 20.8% in 2018 (Cullen et al., 2018), whereas 30-day prevalence rates of combustible cigarette use among high school

Health concerns related to E-cigarettes and JUUL

Combustible cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death (Courtney, 2015), and e-cigarettes are largely viewed as a safer alternative to combustible cigarettes (Cahn and Siegel, 2011). Unlike traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes are free from the process of combustion, which releases pulmonary carcinogens including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, N-nitrosamines, and other cytotoxic compounds that are inhaled by the user (Courtney, 2015; Hecht, 1999). An emerging product also

Cognitive influences: attitudes, knowledge, and misperceptions

Overall, youth are very open to using non-cigarette tobacco products such as e-cigarettes (Mays et al., 2015), and studies have indicated that perceptions of e-cigarettes as less risky, more popular, and more socially acceptable than combustible cigarettes have contributed to their increased use among youth (Ambrose et al., 2014; Anand et al., 2015; Berg et al., 2015; Chaffee et al., 2015; Choi and Forster, 2014; Copeland et al., 2017; Gorukanti et al., 2017; Kong et al., 2015; Mays et al., 2015

E-cigarettes may lead to combustible cigarette use among youth

The ultimate impact of e-cigarettes on public health will depend on their influence on the overall prevalence of cigarette smoking (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018). In contrast to adult e-cigarette users who are almost exclusively current and former cigarette smokers, many youth and young adult users had never used a tobacco product before initiating e-cigarette use (Barnett et al., 2015; Barrington-Trimis et al., 2015; Barrington-Trimis et al.; 2016; Camenga et

E-cigarettes and Cannabis use

The relationship between combustible cigarette use and the initiation, maintenance, and escalation of cannabis use is well-established (Agrawal et al., 2013; Peters et al., 2012), and research suggests that e-cigarettes may confer a similar risk (Azagba, 2018; Dai et al., 2018).

E-cigarette use at 14 years of age was associated with almost a four-fold increase in the odds of initiating and consistently using cannabis two years later (Audrain-McGovern et al., 2018). Nicotine exposure in

E-cigarettes, pod mod devices, and smoking cessation

More than half of youth who smoke combustible cigarettes are interested in quitting, and many adults who endorse e-cigarette use utilize the devices to quit smoking (Babb et al., 2017). Despite the urge to quit smoking, U.S. smokers report significant difficulty abstaining from nicotine use; within a given year, 34% of smokers will attempt to quit, but only 1% will remain tobacco free for at least one year (Stratton et al., 2001). In addition to the physiological addiction that occurs as a

E-cigarette regulation in the United States

Although e-cigarettes were not initially included in the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control of 2009, the FDA finalized a rule in 2016 that extended its regulatory authority to all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes (United States Food and Drug Administration, 2016). As a result, the new law required health warnings on e-cigarettes, and e-cigarettes were held to public health standards set by the law. Additionally, mounting pressure from the FDA and other public-health related

Conclusion

Youth are using e-cigarettes and pod mod devices such as JUUL now more than ever. Given the increasing prevalence of use among impressionable and vulnerable adolescent populations, there is concern that electronic cigarettes may be exposing a significant number of youth to nicotine who would have not otherwise be using tobacco. Although the use of e-cigarettes is generally considered safer in comparison to combustible cigarettes, concerns remain. The developing adolescent brain is susceptible

Contributors

Matthew C. Fadus formulated and wrote the manuscript. Tracy T. Smith provided significant guidance and helped edit and write the manuscript. Lindsay M, Squeglia provided significant guidance and helped edit and write the manuscript. All authors agree to the final submitted version of the manuscript.

Role of funding source

This study was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse R25 DA020537 (Back and Brady), K01 DA047433 (Smith), and U01 DA041093 (Squeglia and Gray); and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism R01AA027399 (Gray and Squeglia) and K23 AA025399 (Squeglia).

Conflict of interest

No conflict declared

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Teri Lynn Herbert of the Medical University of South Carolina for her expertise and assistance with the literature search for this review.

References (156)

  • N. Doran et al.

    Does e-cigarette use predict cigarette escalation? A longitudinal study of young adult non-daily smokers

    Prev. Med.

    (2017)
  • J. Dwyer et al.

    The dynamic effects of nicotine on the developing brain

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (2009)
  • K. East et al.

    The association between smoking and electronic cigarette use in a cohort of young people

    J. Adolesc. Health

    (2018)
  • M.E. Eggers et al.

    Youth use of electronic vapor products and blunts for administering cannabis

    Addict. Behav.

    (2017)
  • L. England et al.

    Nicotine and the developing human: a neglected element in the electronic cigarette debate

    Am. J. Prev. Med.

    (2015)
  • M.L. Goniewicz et al.

    Rise in electronic cigarette use among adolescents in Poland

    J. Adolesc. Health

    (2014)
  • A. Gorukanti et al.

    Adolescents’ attitudes towards e-cigarette ingredients, safety, addictive properties, social norms, and regulation

    Prev. Med.

    (2017)
  • E.T. Hébert et al.

    Exposure and engagement with tobacco- and e-cigarette–related social media

    J. Adolesc. Health

    (2017)
  • Y. Huang et al.

    Nicotine primes the effect of cocaine on the induction of ltp in the amygdala

    Neuropharmacology

    (2013)
  • S. Kalkhoran et al.

    E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lancet Respir. Med.

    (2016)
  • M. Kulik et al.

    E-cigarettes associated with depressed smoking cessation: a cross-sectional study of 28 european union countries

    Am. J. Prev. Med.

    (2018)
  • Y. Lee et al.

    Multiple tobacco product use among adults in the United States: cigarettes, cigars, electronic cigarettes, hookah, smokeless tobacco, and snus

    Prev. Med.

    (2014)
  • A. Loukas et al.

    Exclusive e-cigarette use predicts cigarette initiation among college students

    Addict. Behav.

    (2018)
  • S. Aleyan et al.

    Risky business: a longitudinal study examining cigarette smoking initiation among susceptible and non-susceptible e-cigarette users in canada

    BMJ Open

    (2018)
  • B. Ambrose et al.

    Perceptions of the relative harm of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among U.S. Youth

    Am. J. Prev. Med.

    (2014)
  • B. Apelberg et al.

    Symptoms of tobacco dependence among middle and high school tobacco users: results from the 2012 National Youth Tobacco Survey

    Am. J. Prev. Med.

    (2014)
  • J. Audrain-Mcgovern et al.

    Applying a behavioral economic framework to understanding adolescent smoking

    Psychol. Addict. Behav.

    (2004)
  • J. Audrain-McGovern et al.

    Adolescent e-cigarette, hookah, and conventional cigarette use and subsequent marijuana use

    Pediatrics

    (2018)
  • J.W. Ayers et al.

    Why do people use electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes)? a content analysis of Twitter, 2012-2015

    PLoS One

    (2017)
  • S. Babb et al.

    Quitting smoking among adults - United States, 2000-2015

    MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.

    (2017)
  • J.L. Barrington-Trimis et al.

    Adolescents’ use of "pod mod" e-cigarettes - urgent concerns

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2018)
  • J.L. Barrington-Trimis et al.

    E-cigarette use and subsequent smoking frequency among adolescents

    Pediatrics

    (2018)
  • J.L. Barrington-Trimis et al.

    E-cigarettes, cigarettes, and the prevalence of adolescent tobacco use

    Pediatrics

    (2016)
  • J.L. Barrington-Trimis et al.

    Psychosocial factors associated with adolescent electronic cigarette and cigarette use

    Pediatrics

    (2015)
  • C. Berg et al.

    Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win

    Subst. Use Misuse

    (2015)
  • K. Bold et al.

    Reasons for trying e-cigarettes and risk of continued use

    Pediatrics

    (2016)
  • K. Bold et al.

    Trajectories of e-cigarette and conventional cigarette use among youth

    Pediatrics

    (2018)
  • K. Bold et al.

    E-cigarette susceptibility as a predictor of youth initiation of e-cigarettes

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2017)
  • Bowen A. and Xing C., 2015. US Patent No 9215895: Nicotine Salt Formations for Aerosol Devices and Methods...
  • K. Burns

    JUUL Labs Action Plan

    (2018)
  • Z. Cahn et al.

    Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: A step forward or a repeat of past mistakes?

    J. Public Health Policy

    (2011)
  • P. Caponnetto et al.

    Effect of a nicotine-free inhalator as part of a smoking-cessation programme

    Eur. Respir. J.

    (2011)
  • S. Cengelli et al.

    A systematic review of longitudinal population-based studies on the predictors of smoking cessation in adolescent and young adult smokers

    Tob. Control

    (2012)
  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention

    E-cigarette Ads and Youth

    (2019)
  • B.W. Chaffee et al.

    Conditional risk assessment of adolescents’ electronic cigarette perceptions

    Am. J. Health Behav.

    (2015)
  • B.W. Chaffee et al.

    Electronic cigarette use and progression from experimentation to established smoking

    Pediatrics

    (2018)
  • J.C. Chen

    Flavored e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking reduction and cessation—a large national study among young adult smokers

    Subst. Use Misuse

    (2018)
  • H. Cho et al.

    Differences in adolescent e-cigarette and cigarette prevalence in two policy environments: south Korea and the United States

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2018)
  • J. Cho et al.

    Association between electronic cigarette use and asthma among high school students in south korea

    PLoS One

    (2016)
  • K. Chu et al.

    Vaping on Instagram: cloud chasing, hand checks and product placement

    Tob. Control

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text