Comparative study of the main characteristics and composition of the mainstream smoke of ten cigarette brands sold in Spain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.01.046Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study 10 commercial top selling cigarette brands in Spain have been machine smoked and the mainstream smoke has been analyzed. Multifunctional analysis has been satisfactorily employed to correlate the effect of the main design features of the cigarettes including amount of tobacco, filter size or paper weight with the amount of smoked tobacco and with the ratio CO2/CO. The composition of the vapor phase and that of the particulate matter have been analyzed. The particulate matter retained in the filter of the cigarettes has also been analyzed showing a distinct behavior of the compounds condensed in the cigarette filters and in the traps, related to their retention time. A general trend for the relative yield of some compounds in the different brands have been identified and confirmed by multifunctional analysis. Nevertheless, there are some noticeable compounds that behave differently in the different brands.

Highlights

► Cigarette design and smoke composition of cigarette brands have been analyzed. ► The vapor phase and particulate matter condensed in filter and traps were analyzed. ► Multifunctional analysis was used to correlate cigarette design and smoke compounds.

Introduction

Tobacco is a natural product that consists of more than 3800 constituents. The chemical composition of the tobacco leaf will depend to varying extents upon tobacco variety, leaf stalk position, geographic region in which the leaf is grown, the climate during growing, local cultivation practices, among others (Tso, 1990). Tobacco constituents range from small molecules such as hydrocarbons, terpenes, carbonilics, phenols, or nitriles, to macromolecules as cellulose, lignin or nucleic acids. During the smoking process, this complex biomass is subjected to high temperatures (up to 950 °C) and a varying concentration of oxygen, producing an incomplete combustion which generates a large amount of components. Some of these compounds are toxic and carcinogenic. The smoke composition varies not only with tobacco constituents but also with cigarette varieties, cigarette design, additives employed during processing of tobacco and smoking conditions (Baker Richard, 2006, Borgerding and Klus, 2005). About 4800 compounds have been identified in tobacco smoke. Moreover, the ageing effects and artifact formation may complicate the analysis of these complex mixtures.

The tobacco smoke is composed by a particulate phase and a vapor phase. Low molecular weight hydrocarbons, such as benzene, 1,3-butadiene, or toluene or small aldehydes such as acrolein or butiraldehyde are primarily constituents of the vapor phase. Nicotine, polycyclic aromatic compounds or nitrosamines are associated primarily with the particulate phase (PM), while others are found in both phases (Counts et al., 2005). Potentially harmful smoke constituents have been identified and reviewed (Fowles and Dybing, 2003, Smith and Hansch, 2000, Hoffmann and Hoffmann, 1997). Unfortunately there is no scientific consensus on specific smoke constituents and harm induction relationships (Rodgman and Green, 2003).

Recently some papers have been published on the relationship of the design features of commercial cigarettes (such as tobacco blend type, cigarettes length, filter type, ventilation holes…) and tar, nicotine and CO content of the smoke. Osamu et al. (2009) studied the nicotine, tar and mutagenicity of the mainstream smoke generated under two smoking regimes for the ten major Japanese cigarette brands. Commercial bidi cigarettes sold in USA containing different flavors were studied by Stanfill et al. (2003) and Polzin et al. (2007). Calafat et al. (2004) measured nicotine, tar and CO content of smoke deliveries from 77 cigarette brands purchased in 35 countries under ISO conditions. They also determined physical parameters such as filter length and weight, cigarette weight or filter ventilation levels. Pappas et al. (2007) compared heavy metals contained in the smoke of counterfeit cigarettes to authentic USA brands. Kalaitzoglou and Samara (2006) studied the content of PAH and n-alkanes contained in MSS of 59 commercial cigarette brands from Greece. These authors studied the partitioning of these two families of compounds between the gas fraction and the particulate matter, as will be commented hereafter. The dioxin and dioxin-like compounds content in MSS of twelve commercial US cigarettes brands was more recently studied by Wilson et al. (2008).

Relatively few studies have included a comparable range of smoke constituents for a variety of commercial cigarettes. Gregg et al. (2004) studied 25 commercial UK cigarette brands and analyzed 44 smoke constituents in the mainstream smoke. They established a reasonably good correlation between nicotine and the smoke constituents of the particulate matter, while CO yield was associated with the volatile constituents yield. By other hand, 67 compounds from the smoke of several brands and types of cigarettes sold in Italy were identified by Pieraccini et al. (2008) employing SPME–GC–MS under two smoking regimes. Counts et al. (2005) tested smoke composition of 48 Philip Morris commercial cigarettes from international market regions under three smoking regimes. They analyzed a large number of smoke constituents and established some predicting relationships between tar yield and the smoke constituents for each smoking regime.

In this work the composition of the smoke obtained under the ISO smoking conditions for 10 cigarette brands among the best selling in Spain in 2010 have been analyzed and compared. Multivariant analysis (software PASW Statistics 18, version 18.0.0) has been applied to establish the relationships among the main features of the cigarettes design, the amount of smoked tobacco and the ratio CO2/CO. Thirty-five compounds were identified in the vapor fraction while 85 were identified in the particulate matter, and a general trend for the relative yield of most compounds in the different brands has been established and confirmed by multifunctional analysis. The particulate matter retained in the filter of the cigarettes has also been analyzed and compared with the particulate matter retained in the traps. The results obtained for the cigarette brands sold in Spain have been compared among them and with those for other international commercial cigarettes available in the literature.

Section snippets

Materials

The twelve best-selling brands in Spain for the year 2010, by market share, were: Marlboro, Winston, Fortuna, Chesterfield, Ducados Negro, Ducados Rubio, Camel, L&M, Nobel, Lucky Strike, Pall Mall and John Player SP. Among them, the ten brands shown in Table 1 were chosen for this study. Table 1 also shows information of the type of tobacco blend, as provided by the tobacco companies. For privacy reasons in the following Figures and Tables, brands have been nominated with letters from A to J in

Preliminary analysis

Several physical properties of the cigarettes under study are shown in Table 2. It includes the initial amount of tobacco, the overall cigarette, the filter and paperlength, the cigarette diameter, the filter and paper weight, and the filter ventilation, evaluated as the number of hole rows. All the filters were cellulose acetate tips. The average amount of tobacco smoked for each brand, the particulate matter delivered, and the CO2/CO ratio are shown in Table 3. According to ISO 4387 the

Conclusions

The design features of 10 commercial brands of cigarettes sold in Spain has been reported.

It has been observed that in general, the higher the amount of tobacco initially contained in the cigarette the lower the tobacco consumption during smoking at a fix number of puffs. This is probably a consequence of the lower availability of oxygen in tighter packings. Other variables, such as filter and paper length, may play an important role during the smoking process as has been demonstrated.

Gaseous

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this investigation has been provided by the Spanish “Secretaría de Estado de Investigación” del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (CTQ2008-01023 and MAT2011-24991).

References (22)

Cited by (34)

  • Emission level of seven mainstream smoke toxicants from cigarette with variable tobacco leaf constituents

    2019, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Due to the physical parameters and other differences in those cigarettes, comparisons of results from different laboratories must be done with care. Differences could be found even for reference cigarettes tested under normalized conditions (Marcilla et al., 2012). There has been many studies relating to the potential precursors of seven toxicants (R. R. Baker, 2006b; Britt et al., 2003; Cai et al., 2016; Haidar et al., 1981; Jie et al., 2008; Schlotzhauer et al., 1992; Seeman et al., 2002).

  • Brand variation in oxidant production in mainstream cigarette smoke: Carbonyls and free radicals

    2017, Food and Chemical Toxicology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Together, these effects have linked carbonyls to a significant number of smoking-related diseases (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2012). Previous reports on carbonyls in cigarette smoke show their levels vary by brand (Bodnar et al., 2012; Counts et al., 2004, 2005; Ding et al., 2015; Hammond and O'Conner, 2008; Marcilla et al., 2012; Roemer et al., 2003). Potential sources of variation between cigarette brands include differences in ventilation, tobacco type, filter design, additives, and paper porosity as well as a smoker's unique puff profile (Baker et al., 2004a,b; Chen et al., 2014; Dittrich et al., 2014; Hoffmann et al., 1995; Roemer et al., 2012; Seeman et al., 2003).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text