Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 113, August 2018, Pages 15-31
Preventive Medicine

Review Article
The contribution of health behaviors to socioeconomic inequalities in health: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Health behaviors are key contributors to the socioeconomic gradient in health.

  • Multiple health behaviors contribute more than individual health behaviors.

  • Smoking contributes more than alcohol, physical activity, or dietary patterns.

  • The contribution of health behaviors varies according to multiple factors.

Abstract

Unhealthy behaviors and their social patterning have been frequently proposed as factors mediating socioeconomic differences in health. However, a clear quantification of the contribution of health behaviors to the socioeconomic gradient in health is lacking. This study systematically reviews the role of health behaviors in explaining socioeconomic inequalities in health.

Published studies were identified by a systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Web-of-Science. Four health behaviors were considered: smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity and diet. We restricted health outcomes to cardiometabolic disorders and mortality. To allow comparison between studies, the contribution of health behaviors, or the part of the socioeconomic gradient in health that is explained by health behaviors, was recalculated in all studies according to the absolute scale difference method.

We identified 114 articles on socioeconomic position, health behaviors and cardiometabolic disorders or mortality from electronic databases and articles reference lists. Lower socioeconomic position was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic disorders, this gradient was explained by health behaviors to varying degrees (minimum contribution −43%; maximum contribution 261%).

Health behaviors explained a larger proportion of the SEP-health gradient in studies conducted in North America and Northern Europe, in studies examining all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease, among men, in younger individuals, and in longitudinal studies, when compared to other settings. Of the four behaviors examined, smoking contributed the most to social inequalities in health, with a median contribution of 19%.

Health behaviors contribute to the socioeconomic gradient in cardiometabolic disease and mortality, but this contribution varies according to population and study characteristics. Nevertheless, our results should encourage the implementation of interventions targeting health behaviors, as they may reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health and increase population health.

Introduction

The existence of a stepwise association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and health related outcomes (Antonovsky, 1967; Krieger et al., 1997; Miranda et al., 2008; Bartley, 2004), also referred as the socioeconomic gradient in health, constitutes one of the most consistent findings of epidemiologic research. Individuals with a lower socioeconomic position, as measured by occupational position, educational attainment, income, or composite indexes, are more likely to die earlier and have a higher incidence of cardiovascular events, diabetes, obesity, and other diseases than their more advantaged counterparts (Bartley, 2004; Adler et al., 1993). As eliminating socioeconomic disadvantage from society is difficult, quantifying modifiable intermediate factors and targeting them could have important public health benefits. Epidemiologic research has long investigated potential mediating factors of the association between socioeconomic position and health outcomes, with health behaviors, environmental exposures or psychosocial factors having been identified as major mechanisms in the link between low SEP and increased disease risk (Supplementary Fig. 1) (Matthews et al., 2010; Stringhini et al., 2011a; Stringhini et al., 2012a; Robertson et al., 2015a; Næss et al., 2007; van Oort et al., 2005).

Health behaviors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, diet and physical activity (PA) are major risk or protective factors for chronic diseases (Who and Consultation, 2003; Centers for Disease C, Prevention, 2008; Klatsky et al., 1992) and are also strongly socially patterned, with detrimental behaviors being more prevalent in lower SEP groups when compared to higher SEP groups (Nocon et al., 2007; Macintyre, 2000; Wardle and Steptoe, 2003). Yet, despite extensive investigations, a clear understanding of the role of health behaviors in social inequalities in health is still lacking, a major challenge being that their estimated contribution to the socioeconomic gradient in health varies greatly across studies, ranging from 12% to 72% (van Oort et al., 2005; Stringhini et al., 2011b; Laaksonen et al., 2008; Lantz et al., 1998; Schrijvers et al., 1999; Skalická et al., 2009; Stringhini et al., 2010).

The reasons for the differential contribution of health behaviors to social inequalities in health are numerous and include cultural differences between countries (Stringhini et al., 2011b), demographic characteristics of the participants included in the studies (Tseng and Lin, 2008), between-studies differences in the SEP measures, health behaviors and health outcomes examined, and methodological differences in the calculation of the contribution of health behaviors (Stringhini et al., 2010; Bartley, 2016). Another potential explanation may be related to the stage of the epidemiologic transition, which designates the changes in the prevalence of diseases, disease risk factors, and the changes in the adherence to health behaviors over time and in different sociodemographic contexts (Mackenbach et al., 1997). However, there is currently no attempt in the literature to synthesize the wealth of research on this topic and provide a more comprehensive assessment of health behaviors as mechanisms underlying the association between SEP and health. However, this is a crucial step for identifying targets for policies aimed at reducing socioeconomic differences in health as well as improving health at the population level.

In this study, we conducted a systematic review and synthesis of the literature on the contribution of smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity and dietary patterns to socioeconomic inequalities in all-cause mortality and risk of cardiometabolic disorders, two health outcomes showing a particularly consistent socioeconomic gradient across studies (Avendano et al., 2006a; Suadicani et al., 2001; Stringhini et al., 2013a; Mackenbach et al., 2008). The overarching purpose of this review was to examine all previously published studies investigating the contribution of health behaviors to socioeconomic inequalities in health, and to provide a complete and comprehensive analysis regarding the sources of heterogeneity of this contribution, with a particular focus on methodological, sociodemographic and cultural factors.

Section snippets

Search strategy and inclusion criteria

In this systematic review, we aimed to retrieve and analyze all articles that examined the contribution of health behaviors to the socioeconomic gradient in all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic disorders. We used four main groups of search terms: terms related to SEP, terms related to health behaviors, terms related to health outcomes, and terms related to “contribution”, “role”, or “mediation” (Supplementary Material – search strategy). Article search was performed from August 2015 to

Results

Our search strategy identified 855 potentially relevant articles, of which 740 were found in three electronic databases and 115 were retrieved from reference lists. The article selection process and flow-chart are presented in Supplementary Fig. 2. A total of 537 articles were rejected based on Title/Abstract screening. These studies were mostly health intervention programs, randomized controlled trials or other experimental studies, did not assess the association between SEP and a health

Discussion

In this study, we reviewed the evidence on the contribution of smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity and dietary patterns on social inequalities in all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic disorders. We confirmed the existence of a strong association between SEP and health outcomes, and showed that health behaviors contribute to the SEP gradient in health to varying degrees. In general, the contribution of health behaviors to socioeconomic differences in health was higher in studies

Conclusion

This is the first study to provide a complete and comprehensive synthesis on the factors influencing the contribution of health behaviors to the socioeconomic gradient in health. We observed that health behaviors overall contribute to the association between SEP and health outcomes, but that this contribution varies substantially according to geographic location, sex, age, health outcomes and methodological differences between included studies, the main reason for this heterogeneity being the

Compliance with ethical standards

For this type of study ethics approval is not required.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Professor Katherine Frohlich (University of Montreal) and Professor Mauricio Avendano Pabon (University of Harvard) for helping improve this manuscript. The authors would also like to thank all the collaborators of the Lifepath project (http://www.lifepathproject.eu/).

Funding

This work is supported by the Lifepath project, which is funded by the European commission and the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation - SERI (Horizon 2020 grant n° 633666). Silvia Stringhini is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione Grant n° PZ00P3_167732). The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; and preparation, review or approval of the

References (193)

  • A. Kavanagh et al.

    Socioeconomic position, gender, health behaviours and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease and diabetes

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2010)
  • Y.-H. Khang et al.

    The contribution of material, psychosocial, and behavioral factors in explaining educational and occupational mortality inequalities in a nationally representative sample of South Koreans: relative and absolute perspectives

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2009)
  • P.M. Lantz et al.

    Socioeconomic and behavioral risk factors for mortality in a national 19-year prospective study of US adults

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2010)
  • E.B. Loucks et al.

    Socioeconomic disparities in metabolic syndrome differ by gender: evidence from NHANES III

    Ann. Epidemiol.

    (2007)
  • J.P. Mackenbach et al.

    Health EWGoSIi. Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in Western Europe

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • N.E. Adler et al.

    Socioeconomic inequalities in health. No easy solution

    JAMA

    (1993)
  • E.E. Agardh et al.

    Explanations of socioeconomic differences in excess risk of type 2 diabetes in Swedish men and women

    Diabetes Care

    (2004)
  • E. Agardh et al.

    Socio-economic position at three points in life in association with type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in middle-aged Swedish men and women

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (2007)
  • E. Andresen et al.

    Public Health Foundations: Concepts and Practices

    (2010)
  • A. Antonovsky

    Social class, life expectancy and overall mortality

    Milbank Mem. Fund Q.

    (1967)
  • S. Aslanyan et al.

    Effect of area-based deprivation on the severity, subtype, and outcome of ischemic stroke

    Stroke

    (2003)
  • Association AD

    Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus

    Diabetes Care

    (2014)
  • M. Avendano et al.

    Socioeconomic status and ischaemic heart disease mortality in 10 western European populations during the 1990s

    Heart

    (2006)
  • M. Avendano et al.

    Socioeconomic status and stroke incidence in the US elderly the role of risk factors in the EPESE study

    Stroke

    (2006)
  • Bank W

    Countries and Economies: World Bank

  • M. Bartley

    Health Inequality: An Introduction to Theories, Concepts and Methods

    (2004)
  • M. Bartley

    Health Inequality: An Introduction to Concepts, Theories and Methods

    (2016)
  • A. Beauchamp et al.

    Inequalities in cardiovascular disease mortality: the role of behavioural, physiological and social risk factors

    J. Epidemiol. Community Health

    (2010)
  • N.L. Benowitz

    Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure

    Epidemiol. Rev.

    (1996)
  • H. Bihan et al.

    Socioeconomic position and premature mortality in the AusDiab cohort of Australian adults

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2016)
  • T. Blakely et al.

    The contribution of smoking to inequalities in mortality by education varies over time and by sex: two national cohort studies, 1981–84 and 1996–99

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (2005)
  • D. Blane et al.

    Social selection: what does it contribute to social class differences in health?

    Sociol. Health Illn.

    (1993)
  • M. Bonaccio et al.

    Interaction between education and income on the risk of all-cause mortality: prospective results from the MOLI-SANI study

    Int. J. Public Health

    (2016)
  • M. Bradley Deere et al.

    Life course socioeconomic position and subclinical disease: the Jackson heart study

    Ethn. Dis.

    (2016)
  • B.H. Brummett et al.

    Systolic blood pressure, socioeconomic status, and biobehavioral risk factors in a nationally representative US young adult sample

    Hypertension

    (2011)
  • Centers for Disease C, Prevention

    Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses–United States, 2000–2004

    MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.

    (2008)
  • B. Chaix et al.

    Individual/neighborhood social factors and blood pressure in the RECORD cohort study which risk factors explain the associations?

    Hypertension

    (2010)
  • B.P. Chapman et al.

    Personality, socioeconomic status, and all-cause mortality in the United States

    Am. J. Epidemiol.

    (2010)
  • D.J. Chinn et al.

    Barriers to physical activity and socioeconomic position: implications for health promotion

    J. Epidemiol. Community Health

    (1999)
  • P. Demakakos et al.

    Socioeconomic position and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the ELSA study

    Eur. J. Epidemiol.

    (2012)
  • G.Y. Dinwiddie et al.

    Exploring risk factors in Latino cardiovascular disease: the role of education, nativity, and gender

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2014)
  • R. Doll et al.

    Smoking and carcinoma of the lung

    Br. Med. J.

    (1950)
  • G.M. Egeland et al.

    A man's heart and a wife's education: a 12-year coronary heart disease mortality follow-up in Norwegian men

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (2002)
  • S.C. Elbein et al.

    Heritability of pancreatic β-cell function among nondiabetic members of Caucasian familial type 2 diabetic Kindreds 1

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.

    (1999)
  • J. Feinglass et al.

    Baseline health, socioeconomic status, and 10-year mortality among older middle-aged Americans: findings from the health and retirement study, 1992–2002

    J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.

    (2007)
  • S. Floud et al.

    The role of health-related behavioural factors in accounting for inequalities in coronary heart disease risk by education and area deprivation: prospective study of 1.2 million UK women

    BMC Med.

    (2016)
  • N. Forouhi et al.

    The threshold for diagnosing impaired fasting glucose: a position statement by the European Diabetes Epidemiology Group

    Diabetologia

    (2006)
  • P. Franks et al.

    Do changes in traditional coronary heart disease risk factors over time explain the association between socio-economic status and coronary heart disease?

    BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.

    (2011)
  • C. Fu et al.

    High prevalence of hyperglycaemia and the impact of high household income in transforming Rural China

    BMC Public Health

    (2011)
  • B. Galobardes et al.

    Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1)

    J. Epidemiol. Community Health

    (2006)
  • Cited by (232)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text