Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:54:11.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Costs of Stroke for a Swedish Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Ulf Persson
Affiliation:
The Swedish Institute for Health Economics
Raymunda Sliverberg
Affiliation:
The Swedish Institute for Health Economics
Björn Lindgren
Affiliation:
The Swedish Institute for Health Economics
Bo Norrving
Affiliation:
Lund University Hospital
Gun Jadbäck
Affiliation:
Lund University Hospital
Barbro Johansson
Affiliation:
Lund University Hospital
Britt-Inger Puranen
Affiliation:
Institute for Future Studies, Stockholm

Extract

Direct costs were estimated for the treatment, rehabilitation, and nursing of 125 patients with first stroke in the Lund and Orup health districts (population of 200,191). Patients were followed from the onset of stroke in 1983 until October 31, 1985. The data were used to calculate the present value of the expected lifetime direct costs for an individual contracting his or her first stroke at various ages. For example, at the age of 72, these costs were estimated at SEK 283,000 for a man and SEK 561,000 for a woman. Hospital care was the major cost component (75% for males and 89% for females) at this age of onset. The results could be used to estimate the economic benefits of preventing new strokes, hence, forming part of a cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analysis. Together with prognoses of the expected developments in the incidence of stroke, they could also serve as the basis of forecasts of future costs of the health care and social service sectors.

Type
General Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acheson, J., Achesson, H. W. K., & Tellwright, J. M.The incidence and pattern of cerebrovascular disease in general practice. Journal of Royal College of General Practitioners, 1968, 16, 428–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Adelman, S. M.The economic impact: National survey of stroke. Stroke, 1981, 12 (suppl. 1), 6987.Google ScholarPubMed
Carstairs, V. Stroke: Resource consumption and the costs to the community. In Gillingham, F. J., Maudsley, C., & Williams, E. (eds.), Stroke. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1976, 516–28.Google Scholar
Dale, S. Stroke. OHE Studies of Current Health Problems No. 89. London: Office of Health Economics, 1988.Google Scholar
Drummond, M., & Ward, G. The financial burden of stroke and the economic evaluation of treatment alternatives. In Rose, F. C. (ed.), Stroke: Epidemiological, therapeutic and socioeconomic aspects. London: Royal Society of Medicine Services Ltd., 1986, 147–62.Google Scholar
Drummond, M., Stoddart, G., & Torrance, G.Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Garraway, W. M., Whisnant, J. P., & Drury, I.The changing pattern of survival following stroke. Stroke, 1983, 14, 699703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartunian, N. S., Smart, C. N., & Thompson, M. S.The incidence and economic costs of major health impairments. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1981, 133–92.Google Scholar
Läkemedelsinformation AB. FASS 1984. Stockholm: LINFO, 1984.Google Scholar
Mills, E., & Thompson, M.The economic costs of stroke in Massachusetts. New England Journal of Medicine, 1978, 291, 326–29.Google Scholar
Norrving, B., & Lövenhielm, P.Epidemiology of stroke in Lund–Orup, Sweden 1983–85. Lncidences and age-related changes in subtypes. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia, 1988, 78, 408–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacco, R. L., Wolf, P. A., Kannel, W. B., & McNamara, P. M.Survival and recurrence following stroke. The Framingham study. Stroke, 1982, 13, 290–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terént, A.Medico-social consequences and direct costs of stroke in a Swedish community. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation and Medicine, 1983, 15, 165–71.Google Scholar
Williams, A.Economics of coronary bypass grafting. British Medical Journal, 1985, 291, 326–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar