Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement

  • Published:
European Journal of Political Research

Abstract

The ongoing use of the concept of ‘corporatism’ in industrial democracies has been stretched to include overlapping but still distinctive realities, which in turn often produce different ‘lists’ of corporatist economies. Consequently, this analysis sets out to disentangle the concept of corporatism and to suggest a replacement. It includes a comparative classification of 24 long-term industrial democracies in terms of the corporatism scores given by 23 different scholarly analyses. The divisions in scoring certain important but problematic cases (such as Japan) can be explained by noting differing emphases in the term. I then propose an alternative, more focused summary measure of economic integration which is clearly linear and which has no ‘problem cases’. Precise scores on economic integration are given for four time periods from the late 1960s through the mid-1990s. It will be seen that the industrial democracies have always been dichotomised between integrated and non-integrated (or ‘pluralist’) economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, M. (1991). Capitalisme contre Capitalisme. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R. (1992). The unexpected emergence of Australian corporatism, in J. Pekkarinen, M. Pohjola & B. Rowthorn (eds.), Social corporatism: A superior economic system? (pp. 377–417). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K. (1994). Staat und Arbeitsbeziehungen: Ein Internationaler Vergleich. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K. (1997). Swiss corporatism in comparative perspective, West European Politics 20(4): 164–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim, A. (1988). Workers’ participation and personnel policies in Israel, International Labour Review 127(3): 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaas, W. (1992). The Swiss model: Corporatism or liberal capitalism?, in J. Pekkarinen, M. Pohjola & B. Rowthorn (eds.), Social corporatism: A superior economic system? (pp. 363–376). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaas, W. & Guger, A. (1985). Arbeitsbeziehungen und makroökonomische Stabilität im internationalen Vergleich, in P. Gerlich, E. Grande & W. C. Muller (eds.), Sozialpartnerschaft in der Krise: Leistungen und Grenzen des Neokorporatismus in Österreich (pp. 255–277). Vienna: Hermann Böhlaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, S. (1984). States and unions: From postwar settlement to contemporary stalemate, in S. Bornstein, D. Held & J. Krieger (eds.), The state in capitalist Europe: A casebook (pp. 54–90). London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. (1983). De inkomenspolitiek als politiserings-strategie, Mededelingen van de Subfaculteit der Algemene Politieke en Sociale Wetenschappen, 42, Universiteit van Amsterdam. As cited on pp. 220–222 in H. Keman, J. Woldendorp & D. Braun (eds.), (1985), Het neo-korporatisme als nieuwe politieke strategie: krisisbeheersing met en (door) overleg? Amsterdam: CT Press.

  • Bruno, M. & Sachs, J. D. (1985). Economics of Worldwide Stagflation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L. & Driffill, J. (1988). Bargaining structure, corporatism, and macroeconomic performance, Economic Policy 6: 14–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. R. (1984). Social democracy, corporatism, labour quiescence, and the representation of economic interest in advanced capitalist society, in J. Goldthorpe (ed.), Order and Conflict in contemporary capitalism (pp. 143–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G. (1987). Neocorporatism and the ‘happiness index', or what the trade unions get for their cooperation, European Journal of Political Research 15(4): 381–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compston, H. (1997). Union power, policy making, and unemployment in Western Europe, 1972–1993, Comparative Political Studies 30(6): 732–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, J. (1990). The theory of economic breakdown: An institutional-analytical approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crepaz, M. L. & Lijphart, A. (1995). Linking and integrating corporatism and consensus democracy: Theory, concepts and evidence, British Journal of Political Science 25: 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (1985). Conditions for trade union wage restraint, in L. N. Lindberg & Ch. S. Maier (eds.), The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation (pp. 105–139). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (1990). Generalized political exchange in industrial relations in Europe during the twentieth century, in B. Marin (ed.), Governance and generalized exchange: Self-organizing policy networks in action (pp. 69–116). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czada, R. (1983). Konsensbedingungen und Auswirkungen neokorporatistischer Politikentwicklung, Journal für Sozialforschung 23(4); 421–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher J. (1991). Labour movements, employers, and the state: Conflict and co-operation in Britain and Sweden. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, G. & Lange, P. (1986). Performance in a hostile world: Economic growth in capitalist democracies, World Politics 38: 517–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, M. (1986). Interest representation, party systems, and the state: Italy in comparative perspective, Comparative Politics 18: 279–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, M. D. & Shimada, H. (1993). Wage determination in Japan andWest Germany, in H. Fukui et al. (eds.), The politics of economic change in postwar Japan and West Germany, Volume 1: Macroeconomic Conditions and Policy Responses (pp. 207–232). Basingstoke Macmillan.

  • Hart, J. A. (1992). Rival capitalists: International competitiveness in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo H. & Madsen, H. (1987). Policy and politics in Sweden: Principled pragmatism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. & Krieger, J. (1984). Theories of the state: Some competing claims, in S. Bornstein, D. Held & J. Krieger (eds.), The state in capitalist Europe: A casebook (pp. 1–20). London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, A. (1988a). Social democratic corporatism and economic growth, Journal of Politics 50: 677–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, A. (1988b). National collective action and economic performance: A review article, International Studies Quarterly 32: 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organisation, Yearbook of Labour Statistics, various years. Geneva: ILO.

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1977). Conclusion: Domestic structures and strategies of foreign economic policy, International Organization 31: 879–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1988). Japan, Switzerland of the Far East?, in T. Inoguchi & D. I. Okimoto (eds.), The political economy of Japan, Volume 2: The changing international context (pp. 275–304). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, W. (1992). The spectre of capitalism: The future of the world economy after the fall of communism. London: Radius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, H. (1984). Politics, policies and consequences: A cross-national analysis of public policy-formation in advanced capitalist democracies (1967–1981), European Journal of Political Research 12: 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, H. & Pennings, P. (1995). Managing political and societal conflict in democracies: Do consensus and corporatism matter?, British Journal of Political Science 25: 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. (1991). Political and economic explanations for unemployment: A cross-national and long-term analysis, British Journal of Political Science 21: 315–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (1990). Political power and decision making in Switzerland, in J. E. Hilowitz (ed.), Switzerland in Perspective (pp. 35–50). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, P. & Garrett, G. (1985). The politics of growth, Journal of Politics 47: 792–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, P. & Garrett, G. (1987). The politics of growth reconsidered, Journal of Politics 49: 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (1990). How to end pay leapfrogging, Employment Institute Economic Report 5 (July): 1–5. As cited in A. Tylecote (1992), Core-periphery inequalities in European integration, east and west, in W. Blaas & J. Foster (eds.), Mixed economies in Europe (pp. 237–273). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

  • Layard, R., Nickell, S. & Jackman, R. (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (1979). Liberal corporatism and party government, in Ph. C. Schmitter & G. Lehmbruch (eds.), Trends toward corporatist intermediation (pp. 147–183). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (1984). Concertation and the structure of corporatist networks, in J. H. Goldthorpe (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism (pp. 60–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, F. (1987). Interest intermediation, institutional structures and public policy, in H. Keman, H. Paloheimo & P. Whiteley (eds.), Coping with the economic crisis: Alternative responses to economic recession in advanced industrial societies (pp. 54–82). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, F. (1988). The political economy of distributive conflict, in F. G. Castles, F. Lehner & M. G. Schmidt (eds.), The future of party government, Volume 3: Managing Mixed Economies (pp. 54–96). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. & Crepaz, M. M. L. (1991). Corporatism and consensus democracy in eighteen countries: Conceptual and empirical linkages, British Journal of Political Science 21: 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. N (1985). Models of the inflation-disinflation process, in L. N. Lindberg & Ch. S. Maier (eds.), The politics of inflation and economic stagnation: Theoretical approaches and international case studies (pp. 25–50). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, B. (1985). Austria: The paradigm case of liberal corporatism, in W. Grant (ed.), The Political Economy of Corporatism. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. (1986). Neocorporatism and incomes policy inWestern Europe and North America, Comparative Politics 18: 253–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, J. (1983). Inflation and social consensus in the seventies, Economic Journal 93: 784–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, J. (1986). Unemployment in the OECD countries in the 1980s, Economic Journal 96: 942–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, N. J. (1996). Theoretical and empirical issues in the comparative measurement of union power and corporatism, British Journal of Political Science 26: 419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo, H. (1984a). Pluralism, corporatism and the distributive conflict in developed capitalist countries, Scandinavian Political Studies 7: 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo, H. (1984b). Distributive struggle and economic development in the 1970s in developed capitalist countries, European Journal of Political Research 12: 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo, H. (1984c). Distributive struggle, corporatist power structures and economic policy of the 1970s in developed capitalist countries, in H. Paloheimo (ed.), Politics in the Era of Corporatism and Planning (pp. 1–46). Tampere: Finnpublishers Oy for the Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo, H. (1990a). Between liberalism and corporatism: The effect of trade unions and governments on economic performance in eighteen OECD countries, in R. Brunetta & C. Dell'Aringa (eds.), Labour Relations and Economic Performance (pp. 114–136). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo, H. (1990b). Micro foundations and macro practice of centralized industrial relations, European Journal of Political Research 18: 389–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, L. (1980). Recent theorizations of corporatism: Reflections on a growth industry, British Journal of Sociology 31: 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parri, L. (1987). Neo-corporatist arrangements, ‘Konkordanz’ and direct democracy: The Swiss experience, in I. Scholten (ed.), Political stability and neo-corporatism (pp. 70–94). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen, J. (1992). Corporatism and economic performance in Sweden, Norway and Finland, in J. Pekkarinen, M. Pohjola & B. Rowthorn (eds.), Social Corporatism: A Superior Economic System? (pp. 298–337). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen, J., Pohjola, M. & Rowthorn, B., eds. (1992). Social corporatism: A superior economic system? Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pempel, T. J. & Tsunekawa, K. (1979). Corporatism without labor: The Japanese anomaly, in Ph. C. Schmitter & G. Lehmbruch (eds.), Trends toward corporatist intermediation (pp. 231–270). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piehl, E. (1978). Konzepte gewerkschaftlicher Interessenvertretung in West-Europa, Forum 3(5): 58–83. As cited in R. Czada (1984), Zwischen Arbeitsplatzinteresse und Modernisierungszwang, in H. Wimmer (ed.), Wirtschafts-und Sozialpartnerschalt in Österreich. Vienna: VWGÖ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor F. (1988). Corporatism as an economic system: A review essay, Journal of Comparative Economics 12: 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. (1982a). Staatliche Politik, Parteien und der politische Unterbau: Zur Kritik an Klaus von Beymes ‘Do Parties Matter?', Politische Vierteljahresschrift 23: 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. (1982b). Does corporatism matter? Economic crisis, politics and rates of unemployment in capitalist democracies in the 1970s, in G. Lehmbruch & Ph. C. Schmitter (eds.), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-making (pp. 237–258). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. (1983). The welfare state and the economy in periods of economic crisis: A comparative study of twenty-three OECD nations, European Journal of Political Research 11: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. (1986). Politische Bedingungen erfolgreicher Wirtschaftspolitik: Eine vergleichende Analyse westlicher Industrieländer (1960–1985), Journal für Sozialforschung 26(3): 251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Ph. C. (1979). Still the century of corporatism?, in Ph. C. Schmitter & G. Lehmbruch (eds.), Trends toward corporatist intermediation (pp. 7–52). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Ph. C. (1981). Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America, in S. Berger (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe (pp. 285–327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, I. (1987). Corporatism and the neo-liberal backlash in the Netherlands, in I. Scholten (ed.), Political stability and neo-corporatism (pp. 120–152). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, K. (1984). Policy, power and order: The persistence of economic problems in capitalist states. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalev, M. (1990). Class conflict, corporatism and comparison: A Japanese enigma, in S. N. Eisenstadt & E. Ben-Ari (eds.), Japanese Models of Conflict Resolution (pp. 60–93). London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalev M. (1992). Labour and the political economy in Israel. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, H. (1990). Labor relations in Europe: A history of issues and developments. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. (1990). Reinterpreting corporatism and explaining unemployment: Co-ordinated and non-co-ordinated market economies, in R. Brunetta & C. Dell'Aringa (eds.), Labour relations and economic performance (pp. 170–211). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. (1991). The institutional infrastructure for international competitiveness: A comparative analysis of the UK and Germany, in A. B. Atkinson & R. Brunetta (eds.), Economics for the New Europe (pp. 45–66). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarantelli, E. (1986). The regulation of inflation and unemployment, Industrial Relations 25: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (1987). Does corporatism really matter? The economic crisis and issues of political theory, Journal of Public Policy 7: 259–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (1992). Lessons from ‘corporatist’ theorizations, in J. Pekkarinen, M. Pohjola & B. Rowthorn (eds.), Social corporatism: A superior economic system? (pp. 24–43). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, F. & Unger, B. (1990). Institutionelle Erfolgsbedingungen wirtschaftlichen Strukturwandels, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 16(2): 189–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsujinaka, Y. (1993). Rengō and its osmotic networks, in G. D. Allinson & Y. Sone (eds.), Political Dynamics in Contemporary Japan (pp. 200–213). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. & Hemerijck, A. (1997). 'A Dutch miracle': Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiarda, H. J. (1997). Corporatism and comparative politics: The other great ‘ism'. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky H. & Turner, L. (1987). Democratic corporatism and policy linkages. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P. J. (1989). Corporatism in perspective: An introductory guide to corporatist theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J. J. (1995), Neo-corporatism as a strategy for conflict regulation in the Netherlands (1970–1990), Acta Politica 30: 121–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J. J. (1997), Neo-corporatism and macroeconomic performance in eight small west European countries (1970–1990), Acta Politica 32: 49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, J. (1983). Governments, markets, and growth: Financial systems and the politics of industrial change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

    Alan Siaroff

Authors
  1. Alan Siaroff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siaroff, A. Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research 36, 175–205 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007048820297

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007048820297

Keywords

Search

Navigation