HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schick, S Articles by Glantz, S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schick, S Articles by Glantz, S Related Collections Smoking Environmental tobacco smoke

Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education and Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Suzaynn Schick
PhD, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1390, San Francisco, California, 94143-1390, USA; suzaynn.schick{at}ucsf.edu

Background: Exposure to secondhand smoke causes lung cancer; however, there are little data in the open literature on the in vivo toxicology of fresh sidestream cigarette smoke to guide the debate about smoke-free workplaces and public places.

Objective: To investigate the unpublished in vivo research on sidestream cigarette smoke done by Philip Morris Tobacco Company during the 1980s at its Institut für Biologische Forschung (INBIFO).

Methods: Analysis of internal tobacco industry documents now available at the University of California San Francisco Legacy Tobacco Documents Library and other websites.

Results: Inhaled fresh sidestream cigarette smoke is approximately four times more toxic per gram total particulate matter (TPM) than mainstream cigarette smoke. Sidestream condensate is approximately three times more toxic per gram and two to six times more tumourigenic per gram than mainstream condensate by dermal application. The gas/vapour phase of sidestream smoke is responsible for most of the sensory irritation and respiratory tract epithelium damage. Fresh sidestream smoke inhibits normal weight gain in developing animals. In a 21day exposure, fresh sidestream smoke can cause damage to the respiratory epithelium at concentrations of 2 µg/l TPM. Damage to the respiratory epithelium increases with longer exposures. The toxicity of whole sidestream smoke is higher than the sum of the toxicities of its major constituents.

Conclusion: Fresh sidestream smoke at concentrations commonly encountered indoors is well above a 2 µg/m³ reference concentration (the level at which acute effects are unlikely to occur), calculated from the results of the INBIFO studies, that defines acute toxicity to humans. Smoke-free public places and workplaces are the only practical way to protect the public health from the toxins in sidestream smoke.

Abbreviations: CalEPA, California Environmental Protection Agency; DMBA, 7,12 dimethylbenz()anthracene; FTC, Federal Trade Commission; INBIFO, Institut für Biologische Forschung; LOAEL, lowest observed adverse effect level; NOEL, no observable effect level; SHS, secondhand smoke; TPM, total particulate matter

Keywords: tobacco smoke pollution; environmental tobacco smoke pollution; passive smoking; toxicology; inhalation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O.P. Kurmi and J.G. Ayres Review Series: Occupational and environmental lung disease: The non-occupational environment and the lung: opportunities for intervention Chronic Respiratory Disease, November 1, 2007; 4(4): 227 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. K. Tong and S. A. Glantz Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): 1845 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Semple, L. Maccalman, A. A. Naji, S. Dempsey, S. Hilton, B. G. Miller, and J. G. Ayres Bar Workers' Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke: The Effect of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Occupational Exposure Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2007; 51(7): 571 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chapman The future of smoke-free legislation BMJ, September 15, 2007; 335(7619): 521 - 522. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. F. Schick and S. Glantz Concentrations of the Carcinogen 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-Pyridyl)-1-Butanone in Sidestream Cigarette Smoke Increase after Release into Indoor Air: Results from Unpublished Tobacco Industry Research Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2007; 16(8): 1547 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Zellers, M. A. Thomas, and M. Ashe Legal Risks to Employers Who Allow Smoking in the Workplace Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1376 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Schick and S. A Glantz Sidestream cigarette smoke toxicity increases with aging and exposure duration Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(6): 424 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Tanne North America has new outbreaks of antibiotic associated C difficile BMJ, December 17, 2005; 331(7530): 1425. [Full Text]

				R. Dobson Smoke from cigarette tip is more toxic than main inhaled smoke BMJ, December 17, 2005; 331(7530): 1425 - 1425. [Full Text] [PDF]